NEW PROVIDERS IN THE HIGHER EDUCATION MARKET
Abstract
Globalization, commercialization and virtualization of higher education led to the transformation of traditional functions of universities and the emergence of new types of training providers. Traditional universities, on the one hand, keeping the historical features, objectives and functions actively use modern educational tools provided by scientific and technological revolution, on the other hand, some traditional universities are activelymodifying and integrating into a modern educational infrastructure. The role of new providersof higher education, both national and international, is constantly growing. There are new kinds of educational providers, more compliant the higher education market and opportunities of modern educational technologies. New providers can be conditionally divided into two large groups - the actual educational institutions and non-education providers to ensure these educational processes. Activities of new providers significantly changes the landscape ofhigher education market - an increasing number of market participants of educational services,that specialize in certain functions of the educational process, the merging of higher education providers and manufacturing companies.
Keywords
высшее образование,
университеты,
провайдеры высшего образования,
коммерческие университеты,
кибер-университет,
корпоративный университет,
виртуальный университет,
предпринимательский университет,
higher education market,
university,
providers,
for-profit university,
cyber-university,
corporate university,
virtual university
References
1. Smith Р. (2004) The Quiet Crisis: How Higher Education Is Failing America. Jossey-Bass Inc. Pub. 200 p.
2. Impact of economic crisis on higher education in East Asia. Country experiences / Ed. by N.V. Varghese (2001). Policy Forum (UNESCO). 2001. No. 12. 215 р.
3. Лукашенко M.A. Российская система образования. Рыночная трансформация в условиях транзитивной экономики. M.: Экономика, 2002. 198 с. [Lukashenko M.A. (2002). Russian education system. Market transformation in the conditions of transitive economy. Moscow: Ekonomika Publ. 198 p. (in Russ.)]
4. Константинов Г.Н., Филонович С.Р. Что такое предпринимательский университет // Вопросы образования. 2007. № 1. С. 49-62. [Konstantinov G.N., Filonovich S.R. (2007). What is an enterprise university]. Voprosy obrazovania [Education issues]. No. 1, pp. 49-62. (In Russ.)]
5. Bennell P., Pearce Т. (1998) The Internationalization of Higher Education: Exporting Education to Developing and Transitional Economies. IDS Working Paper 75. Brighton, U.K.: Institute of D evelopme nt Studie s, University of Sussex. 27 р.
6. Dos Santos М. (2002) Regulation and quality assurance in transnational education. Tertiary education and management. No. 8(2). Pр. 97-112.
7. Knight J. (2006) Commercial cross-border education: implications for financing higher education. Higher Education in the World. London, 2006. No. 3. Pр. 103-112.
8. Guruz К. (2008) Higher Education and International Student Mobility in the Global Knowledge Economy. NY, State University of New York Press. 2008. 335 р.
9. Грудзинский A.O. Университет как предпринимательская организация // Социологические исследования. 2003. №4. C. 113-121 [Grudzinskiy A.O. (2003) University as an enterprise organization]. Sociologicheskie issledovania [Sociological researches]. No. 4. Pp. 113-121. (In Russ.)]
10. Clark B.R. (1998) Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. New York: Pergamon Press. 163 р.
11. Mendivil J.L.I. (2002). The new providers of higher education. Higher Education Policy. 2002. No. 15. Pр. 353-364.
12. Яловецкий Б. Перспективы развития частного высшего образования в Польше // Высшее образование в Европе. 2001. № 3 [Yalovetskiy B. (2001) Prospects of development of private higher education in Poland. Vyssheye obrazovanie v Evrope [Higher Education in Europe ]. No. 3. (in Russ.)]. Available at: http://www.aha.ru/~moscow64/educational_book/_3_03/HEE_XXVI_3_2001/YALOV.HTM
13. Professors’ caution over for-profit universities. News: family and education, 16 June 2011. Available at: URL: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education
14. Meister J. C. (2006) Corporate Universities: What Works and What Doesn’t. Chief Learning Officer. No. 5(3). Pр. 28-32.
15. Nixon J, Helms M. (2002) Corporate Universities vs Higher Education Institutions. Industrial and Commercial Training. MCB University Press. 2002. Vol. 34. No. 4. Pр. 144-150.
16. Corporate Universities: Lessons in building a world class workforce. New York: McGraw Hill, 1998. 256 р.
17. Paton R., Peters G., Storey J., Taylor S. (2005) Corporate Universities as Strategic Learning Initiatives. The Hand book of Corp or ate University Development: Managing Strategic Learning Initiatives in the Public and Private Domains. Gower, London.
18. Коновалова В. Мировые тенденции обучения и развития персонала и ситуация в России // Кадровик. Кадровый менеджмент. 2008. № 9. [Konovalova V. (2008) World tendencies of training and development of the personnel and situation in Russia (in Russ.). Kadrovik. Kadrovyy menedzhment [Personnel officer. Personnel management]. No. 9. Available at: http://www.case-hr.com/statiyi-i-otcheti/35008.html
19. Морев И.А. Образовательные информационные технологии. Ч. 1. Обучение: Учеб. пособие. Владивосток: Изд-во Дальневосточного университета, 2004. 162 с. [Morev I.A. (2004) Educational information technologies. Part 3. Distance Learning]. Vladivostok: FEFU Publ, 150 p. (in Russ.)].
Review
Views:
290
Email this article 