ABOUT THE BORROWING VICARIOUS MATERIAL IN SCIENCE AND IN EDUCATIONAL PROCESS (DISCUSSION)
Abstract
The question about measures to counteract the borrowing vicarious material forscientific and educational work has not yet received proper discussion on the background of the problems associated with the unified state examination, the transition to two-tier system of higher education (bachelor - master) entering its final stage, and the reform of the Academies of Sciences (they caused a discussion in the scientific and teaching circles). The journalists, officials in the field of science and education and, finally, those who carry out suchan audit (advertising themselves) more vividly give their view on this topic. But there are somecontroversial points in this question, such as the difference in approaches to the scientific, educational and teaching and methodical materials; the existence of sufficient legal grounds; the optimality of the existing mechanism and others. Ignoring these issues will cause considerable damage to higher education and even greater losses to science.
References
1. [Order of the Russian Ministry of Education of 12 September 2013 No. 1061 «On approval of the list of specialties and directions of training of higher education»]. Rossiyskaya gazeta [Russian Gazette]. 2013, no. 247.
2. Zagvyazinskiy V.I., Zakirova A.F. (2013) [About the normative regulation and formation of methodological culture of teachers-researchers]. Obrazovanie i nauka [Education and science]. No. 5, рр. 3–16. (In Russ.)
3. [Russian Federation Government decree dated September 24, 2013 № 842 «About an order of award of scientific degrees»]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Collection of legislation of the Russian Federation]. 2013, part III, art. 5074.
4. Fel’dshtein D.I. (2012) [Certification of scientific personnel of pedagogical and psychological professions]. Obrazovanie i nauka [Education and science]. No. 10, рр. 5–27. (In Russ.)
5. Lebedev S.A. (2012) [Russian science and higher education: twenty years after]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. No. 11, pp. 82–88. (In Russ.)
6. Lipski S.A. (2002) Institutsional’nye preobrazovaniya v sisteme zemel’nykh otnosheniy i ikh issledovanie (model’ Rossii kontsa XX – nachala XXI veka): Monografiya [Institutional transformations in the system of land relations and their investigation (model Russia in the end of XX – beginning of XXI century): Monograph]. Moscow: Meyn Publ., 276 р.
7. Lipski S.A. (2004) [On some aspects of organization of educational process in the field of land use and land management]. Zemleustroystvo i zemel’nyy kadastr: Sb. nauchn. statey [Land use planning and land cadastre: Collection of scientific articles]. Moscow: GUZ Publ., рр. 299-309.
8. Nikiforov A.L., Reznik Yu.M. (2013) [On the situation in the domestic academic science (dialogue)]. Lichnost’. Kul’tura. Obshchestvo. [The personality. Culture. Society]. Vol. 15, no. 3–4, рр. 298-315. (In Russ.)
Review
Views:
261
Email this article 