RANKING RUSSIAN UNIVERSITIES: HOW TO MEASURE?
Abstract
The authors propose to use vector representation of university areas of activities for ranking universities. Two novel indices reflecting UN experts’ recommendations are introduced. Based on expert estimates, a priority vector of weights enables to represent the university activity.
About the Authors
Maria V. Seroshtan
Southern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Boris M. Vladimirskiy
Southern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Seroshtan M.V., Vladimirskiy B.M. (2013) [What kind of university ranking system do we need?]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 8-9, pp. 48-54 (In Russ.)
2. Kincharova A. (2012) Mirovye reytingi universitetov: metodologiya, effekty i kritika. Preprint tsentra sotsial’no-politicheskikh issledovaniy tekhnologiy TPU [World University Rankings: Methodology, Effects and Critique. Preprint, TPU Center for Social and Political Studies]. Tomsk: TPU Publ., 29 p. (In Russ.)
3. Arzhanova I.V., Larionova M.V., Zavarykina L.V., Perfil’eva O.V., Nagornov V.A., Lopatina A.S., Lazutina I.V., Zhurakovskiy V.M., Baryshnikova M.Yu. (2013) [Multidimensional ranking methodology: potential for comprehensive university assessment]. Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organisatsiy [International Organizations Bulletin]. No.1, pp.8-30 (In Russ.)
4. [World Declaration on higher educati on for the XXI century: approaches and practical measures]. Available at: http://www.lexed.ru/mpravo/razdel2/?doc21.html (In Russ.)
5. Malinetskiy G.G., Potapov A.B. (2000) Sovremennye problemy nelineynoy dinamiki [Modern problems of nonlinear dynamics]. Moscow: Editorial URSS Publ., 276 p. (In Russ.)
6. Saaty T.L., Kearns K.P. (1991) Analiticheskoe planirovanie. Organizatsiya sistem [Analytical planning: the organization of systems]. Moscow: Radio i Svyaz’ Publ., 224 p.
Review
Views:
278
Email this article 