EVALUATION COMPETENCE OF A UNIVERSITY TEACHER: CONTENTAND PURPOSES
Abstract
The article proves the necessity of singling out the evaluation competence in the structure of the university teacher’s professional culture. The significance of this competence has enhanced lately due to the requirement of working@out the assessment funds, aimed at identifying the levels of students’ competencies and conducting evaluation procedures of students’ achievements assessment. The author considers the evaluation competence to be the key teacher’s competence as it finally defines his pedagogical culture. This competence characterizes teacher’s acquaintance withassessment methods for measuring students’ learning outcomes, his ability to master technologies for stimulating students to further progress in learning. The evaluation competence includes five units: knowledge, technology, reflexion, development and assessment.
References
1. Isaeva T.E. (2010) Kompetentsii studentov i prepodavatelei vysshei shkoly: sposoby formirovaniya i otsenivaniya [Competences of students and teachers of a higher school: methods of forming and evaluation]. Rostov-on-Don: Rostov State Transport University Publ., 152 p.
2. Isaeva T.E. (2013) Kompetentsii sub’ektov universitetskogo obrazovaniya. [Competences of the subjects of university education. Problems of competences’ formation and evaluation in the informative educational area]. Deutschland: Palmarium Academic Publishing. 247 p.
3. Kim I.N., Lisienko S.V. (2012) [Formation of the basic components of the professional competency of the university teacher according to the Federal State Educational Standards]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 1, pp. 16–24. (in Russ., abstract in Eng.)
4. Shadrikov V.D. (2007) [The basic competences of the pedagogical activity]. Sibirskii uchitel’ [The Siberian teacher]. No. 6 (54), pp. 5-15. (in Russ.)
5. Efremova N.F. (2012) [Evaluation quality as a guarantee of the students’ competence-based education]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 11, pp. 119–125. (in Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Prakhova M.Y., Kolovertnov G.Y., Shalovnikov E.A. (2012) [On the role of testing as an instrument of knowledge evaluation at the university]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 7, pp. 113-116. (in Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Verbitsky A.A., Puchkova E.B. (2013) [The potential of tests as a means of education quality diagnostics: myths and reality]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 6, pp. 33–34. (in Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. Gitman M.B., Danilov A.N., Stolbov V.Yu. (2012) [On an approach to the assessment of development level of the basic competences of the university graduate students]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 4, pp. 13-18. (in Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9. Кudryavtseva E.I. [Methodological fundamentals of competences measurement and evaluation]. II mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya “Kompetentnosti i kompetentsii personala otraslevykh organizatsii” [Competencies and competences of the personnel of the industry institutions. Proc. Sci. and practical. conf.]. Ekaterinburg: Ural. State Teachers’ Training University Publ., 2011. (in Russ.)
10. Training and Assessment Qualifications and Competencies. Site of Federation University. Australia. Available at: http://policy.ballarat.edu.au/tafe/teacher_qualifications_competence/ch01.php
11. Minin M.G., Benson G.F., Belomestnova E.N., Pakanova V.S. (2012) [Pedagogical training of a teacher of an engineering university]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 4, pp. 20-29. (in Russ., abstract in Eng.)
Review
Views:
372
Email this article 