ENTREPRENEURIAL UNIVERSITY AND THE TRIPLE HELIX THEORY
Abstract
The paper aims to analyze the features of interpretation of the notion of entrepreneurial university within the Triple Helix theory in the light of the capitalization of knowledge problem. Following the traditional understanding (B. Clark) the notion of entrepreneurial university connects the capitalization of knowledge with the external socioeconomic factors. At the same time, within the Triple Helix theory (H. Etzkowitz et al.) this notion gives a possibility to evaluatean internal dynamics of the capitalization of knowledge based on the analysis of the epistemological and cognitive roots of knowledge production.
Keywords
предпринимательский университет,
Тройная спираль,
капитали- зация знания,
эпистемологические икогнитивные факторы получения знания,
Б. Кларк,
Г. Эшковиц,
entrepreneurial university,
Triple Helix,
capitalization of knowledge,
epistemological and cognitive roots of knowledge production,
B. Clark,
H. Etzkowitz
About the Authors
Nikita V. Golovko
Novosibirsk State University, Institute for the Philosophy and Law of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valeriya V. Degtyareva
Novosibirsk State Technological University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Svetlana A. Madyukova
Institute for the Philosophy and Law of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Clark B. (1998) Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organization Pathways of Transformation. Guildford, UK: Pergamon
2. Etzkowitz H. (2008) The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation In Action. London: Routledge
3. Головко Н.В. Неолиберальная концепция науки и экономика знаний // Вестник Новосиб. гос. ун-та. Сер. «Философия». 2012. Т. 10. Вып. 4. С. 57-63 [Golovko N.V. (2012) Neoliberal conception of science and knowledge economics. Vestnik Novosib. gos. un-ta. Seriya: Filosofiya [Vestnik of the Novosibirsk State University. Series: Philosophy]. Vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 57-63. (In Russ.)]
4. Головко Н.В. Наука в глобализирующемся мире: профессиональная деятельность или общественное благо? // Вестник Новосиб. гос. ун-та. Сер. «Философия». 2011. Т. 9. Вып. 4. С. 22-29 [Golovko N.V. (2011) Science in the globalized world: professional activity or public good? Vestnik Novosib. gos. un-ta. Seriya: Filosofiya [Vestnik of the Novosibirsk State University. Series: Philosophy]. Vol. 9, no. 4, рр. 22-29. (In Russ.)]
5. Nowotny H., Scott P., Gibbons M. (2001) ReThinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press
6. Рузанкина Е.А. Наука второго рода: новые формы производства знаний и трансфера технологий // Вестник Новосиб. гос. ун-та. Сер. «Философия». 2013. Т. 11. Вып. 2. С. 49-53 [Ruzankina E.A. (2013) ModeB2 science: new forms of knowledge industries and technology transfer. Vestnik Novosib. gos. un-ta. Seriya: Filosofiya [Vestnik of the Novosibirsk State University. Series: Philosophy]. Vol. 11, no. 2, рр. 49-53. (In Russ.)]
7. Hess D. (2007) Alternative Pathways in Science and Industry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
8. Головко Н.В. Проблема безбилетника и предел эффективности коллективного действия // Вестник Новосиб. гос. ун-та. Сер. «Философия».2012. Т. 10. Вып. 3. С. 43-50 [Golovko N.V. (2012) The free-rider problem and effectiveness of the collective action. Vestnik Novosib. gos. un-ta. Seriya: Filosofiya [Vestnik of the Novosibirsk State University. Series: Philosophy]. Vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 43-50. (In Russ.)]
9. Viale R., Etzkowitz H. (eds.) (2010) Knowledge Driven Capitalization of Knowledge. The Capitalization of Knowledge: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, рр. 31-73
Review
Views:
420
Email this article 