KINDS OF RATINGS OF EDUCATION RELATED SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS
Abstract
When publishing an education related article, a problem of choosing and evaluating a scientific periodical rises. A simple comparison of educational journals ranks in Russian ratings and other resources that use an appropriate approach in selection and assessment of journals, which allows them to rate journals, shows ambiguous results. The conducted analysis revealed that none of resources offers a full range of reputable journals in an analyzed category, thus, cannot be a universal tool in this field.
Keywords
наукометрия,
Российский индекс научного цитирования,
научный журнал,
импакт-фактор,
рейтинг журналов,
Высшая аттестационная комиссия,
Russian Science Citation Index,
Scopus,
Web of Science,
scientometrics,
Russian Science Citation Index,
scientific journal,
impact factor,
journal rating,
State Commission for Academic Degrees and Titles,
Scopus,
Web of Science
About the Authors
Natela N. Kvelidze-Kuznetsova
Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir V. Laptev
Russian Academy of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Svetlana A. Morozova
Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Amiryan, A.A., Tsyrenova, D.Sh. (2015). [The Conceptual Model of the Evaluation and Ratings Information System for Scientific Journals]. Elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal [Electronic Scientific Journal]. No. 3(3), pp. 268-273. Available at: http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25420450 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
2. Kirillova, O.V., Kuznetsov, A. Yu., Dimentov, A.V., Lebedev, V.V., Shvartsman, M.E. (2014). [Categories and Criteria for Russian Journals Evaluation and their Development Programs]. Nauchnaya periodika: problemy i resheniya [Scholarly Communication Review]. No. 5(23), pp. 20 34. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
3. Kirillova, O.V. (2015). [A Competition of Programs for Journals Development as a Reflection of the State of Scientific Publishing in the Russian Federation]. Nauchnaya periodika: problemy i resheniya [Scholarly Communication Review]. Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 56-74. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
4. Antopol’skiy, A.B., Usanov, V.E. (2013). [On Bibliometric Indicators Used in Evaluating Scientific Pedagogical and Psychological Journals]. Problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya [Problems of Modern Education]. No. 5, pp. 160-173. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
5. Bolotov, V.A., Kvelidze-Kuznetsova, N.N., Laptev, V.V., Morozova, S.A. (2014). [The h Index in the Russian Science Citation Index]. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies]. No. 1, pp. 241 262. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
6. Shinyayeva, T.S., Sedysheva, V.S., Tarasevich, Yu.Yu. (2015). [Do Scientometric Indicators of Domestic Journals Calculated by Various Organizations Correlate?]. Informatizatsiya obrazovaniya i nauki [Informatization of Education and Science]. No. 1 (25), pp. 55 71. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
7. Polonsky, V.M. (2014). [The Bigger, the Better? (To the Evaluation of the Results of Scientific Activity)]. Pedagogika [Pedagogy]. No. 2, pp. 35 39. (In Russ.).
8. Moskaleva, O.V. (2014). [University Rankings and Scientific Journals]. Nauchnaya periodika: problemy i resheniya [Scholarly Communication Review]. No. 4 (22), pp. 9 20. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
Review
Views:
348
Email this article 