Preview

Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia

Advanced search

THIRD GENERATION UNIVERSITY: B. CLARK AND J. WISSEMA

Abstract

The paper aims to analyze the Clarks' concept of entrepreneurial university within the 3rd generation university theory by J. Wissema. Originally the Clarks' entrepreneurial university is defined by the set of consistent practices (independence from the governmental funding, management quality, entrepreneurial culture etc.) that demonstrate the potential to commercialize an obtained knowledge. The useful interpretation of entrepreneurial university within the Wissema's 3rd generation university theory gives an opportunity to evaluate the quality of internal policies that the university established to develop the entrepreneurial culture. The very fact that within the Wissema's concept the reasons of necessity of the develop of the entrepreneurial culture are not based on the external conditions (requirements to advance the development of the innovation economics, the technology transfer etc.), but are based on the internal requirements to fight the rivalry for funding, talented academics, prospective students etc., helps to move from the discussion of the development of the entrepreneurial activities within the third mission framework to the discussion of the transformation of the first mission by the bringing up to date the curricula and pedagogy towards the entrepreneurial culture shaping.

About the Authors

Nikita V. Golovko
Novosibirsk State University; Institute for the Philosophy and Law of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation


Ol'ga V. Zinevich
Novosibirsk State Technical University
Russian Federation


Elizaveta A. Ruzankina
Novosibirsk State Technological University
Russian Federation


References

1. Wissema, J. (2009). Towards the Third Generation University: Managing the University in Transition. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

2. Clark, B. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organization Pathways of Transformation. Guildford, UK: Pergamon.

3. Clark, B. (2004). Sustaining Change in Universities: Continuities in Case Studies and Concepts. New York: Open University Press.

4. Gibb, A. (2007). Entrepreneurship: Unique Solutions for Unique Environments. Is it Possible to Achieve This with the Existing Paradigm? International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education. No. 5, pp. 93-142.

5. Golovko, N.V. (2014). [Entrepreneurial University and Stinchcombe’s Functionalism]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. [Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University. Series: Philosophy]. Vol. 12, no. 3, рр. 53-61. (In Russ.)

6. Golovko, N.V., Ruzankina, E.A. (2016). [Entrepreneurial University: Academic Capitalism and Stakeholder Governance]. Vlast’ [The Authority]. No. 5, pp. 67-74. (In Russ.)

7. Golovko, N.V., Zinevich, O.V., Ruzankina, E.A. (2014). [Universities Third Mission and the Public Understanding of Science Project: Bodmer’s report]. Filosofiya obrazovaniya [Philosophy of Education]. No. 6 (57), pp. 77-93. (In Russ.)

8. Golovko, N.V., Degtyareva, V.V., Madyukova, S.A. (2014). [Entrepreneurial University and Triple Helix Theory]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 8-9, pp. 45-53. (In Russ.)

9. Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. London: Continuum. 10. Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix: University–Industry–Government Innovation in Action. London: Routledge.


Review

Views: 1359


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-3617 (Print)
ISSN 2072-0459 (Online)