«EDUCATIONAL ENGINEERING» IN THE CONTEXT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CDIO IDEOLOGY
Abstract
Abstract. The article presents an educational project of the implementation of the main ideas of the CDIO worldwide initiative developed at the higher engineering school of Ural Federal University. A description of a new practical educational course and the authors’ technology of educational engineering are presented. They are designed to prepare graduates to work in different stages of the life cycle of a technical system. The comparative analysis of the developed educational technologies and the technologies used by the other universities (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, The Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering, and Singapore Polytechnic) given in the article shows that our model of study engineering basically differs from the methods applied at the leading universities. The results of the application of educational engineering in the teaching process of engineering baccalaureate in Ural Federal University as well as the analysis of the resources necessary for widespread implementation of the developed innovations in educational process are presented in the article.
About the Authors
Alexandеr P. Isaev
Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Economics), Prof.
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Economics), Prof.
Leonid V. Plotnikov
Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Technical), Assoc. Prof.
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Technical), Assoc. Prof.
References
1. Pereosmyslenie inzhenernogo obrazovaniya. Podkhod CDIO. [Rethinking Engineering Education. The CDIO Approach] / Jedvard F. Krouli, Johan Malmkvist, Soren Ostlund, Doris R. Broder, Kristina Jedstrem, Chuchalin, A.I. (Ed). Moscow: HSE Publishing House, 2015. 502 p. (In Russ.)
2. Norström, A., Hovinen, T. (2016). Working Day Model for Students in Chemical and Materials Engineering. In: Proc. 12th Int. CDIO Conf., Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland, June 12N16, 2016, pр. 489-496.
3. Crawley, E.F., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., Brodeur, D.R., Edstrom, K. (2014). Rethinking Engineering Education; The CDIO Approach. NY, USA: Springer, 326 p.
4. Chuchalin, A.I. (2016). [Application of the CDIO Approach to Three Level Engineering Programs Design]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 4, pp. 17-32. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. IsakssonNPersson, H., Gumaelius, L. (2016). CDIO Implementation in Swedish Upper Secondary Education. In: Proc. 12th Int. CDIO Conf., Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland, June 12N16, 2016. Рр. 606-618.
6. Pee, S.H., Leong, H. (2016). Reformulating Engineering Education at Singapore Polytechnic. In: Proc. 2nd Int. CDIO Conf., Linkoping, Sweden, June 13–14, 2006. [Linkoping, 2006]. 11 p. Available at: http://www.cdio.org/files/document/file/Pee_etal.pdf
7. Sivitskaya, L.A., Mityanina, O.E. (2013). [The CDIO International Initiative Implementation Practices for Reforming Engineering Education In National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University]. Vestnik burjatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Teoriya i metodika obucheniya [Bulletin of the Buryat State University]. No. 15, pp. 60-64. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. Chicherina, N.V., Ivanova, E.E., Korel’skaya, M.A. (2014). [Implementing CDIO as a Tool for NAsFU Programs]. Inzhenernoe obrazovanie [Engineering Education]. No. 16, pp. 168-173. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
Review
Views:
439
Email this article 