ANNUAL FACULTY WORK ASSESSMENT BY USING THE INDEX SYSTEM
Abstract
Abstract. The article presents brief excerpts from the annual report of the supervisor of the evaluation system of the faculty activities. The author dwells on the description of the gradual continuous improvement of the evaluation system of teachers, the data collection process and summarized results of the teaching staff work at Ukhta State Technical University.
About the Author
Konstantin V. Rochev
Ukhta State Technical University, Ukhta
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Economics), Head of the Department of computing, information systems and technologies
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Economics), Head of the Department of computing, information systems and technologies
References
1. Grivennaya, E.N., Starostenko, I.N. (2011). [The Mathematical Model of Rating Evaluation of Professional Activity of a Teacher of Higher Educational Institution]. Iurist Pravoved [The Lawyer]. No. 5, pp. 7-12. (In Russ.)
2. Ilyina, I.Yu., Samorodova, A.V. (2009). [Problems to Organize an Optimum System for Motivation and Work Incentives of Lecturers at Higher Education Institutions]. Problemy ekonomiki [Economics Issues]. No. 2, pp. 48–49. (In Russ.)
3. Kuz’minov, Ya.I. (2011). [Academic Community and Academic Contracts: Calls and Answers of the Last Time]. Kontrakty v akademicheskom mire [Contracts in the Academic World]. Publishing house NIU HSE. Pp. 13-31. (In Russ.)
4. Kupera, A.V. (2005). [Stimulation of Lecturer“s Activity at Higher Education Institution]. Vestnik Tikhookeanskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Pacific State Economic University]. No. 3. Pp. 113–124. (In Russ.)
5. Mikhalyova, O.M. (2009). [About Motivation and Work Incentives of the Teaching Staff at Higher Education Institutions]. Chelovek i trud [Man and Work]. No. 1, pp. 67-67. (In Russ.)
6. Rabinovich, M.I., Stepanova, E.Yu. (2009). [On the Development of a Typology Rating Problems for Evaluating the Performance of Teachers and Departments for the System of Moral and Material Incentive]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis]. No. 3, pp. 23–28. (In Russ.)
7. Danilov, G.V., Rochev, K.V., Tskhadaya, N.D., Marakasov, F.V., Emeksuzyan, A.R. (2014). Sistema materialnogo stimulirovaniya professorsko prepodavatelskogo sostava v Ukhtinskom gosudarstvennom tekhnicheskom universitete [System of Material Encouragement of the Teaching Staff at Ukhta State Technical University]. Publishing House Science and Innovation Center, SaintNLouis, Missouri, USA. 356 p. (In Russ.)
8. Danilov, G.V. (2008). [Index System to Stimulate Employees]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. No. 5, pp. 86-90. (In Russ.)
9. Rochev, K.V. (2016). [Performance Assessment of the Information Index Faculty Incentive System]. Informatsionnye tekhnologii v upravlenii i ekonomike [Information Technology in Management and Economics], No. 1. Available at: http://itue.ru/?p=1013 (In Russ.)
10. Rochev, K.V. (2012). [Analysis of the Results of the Work of the Faculty]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Research]. No. 11, pp. 134–140. (In Russ.)
11. Rochev, K.V. (2015). [Overview of the Main Results of Formation of Effective System of MateN rial Stimulation of of the University Staff]. Resursy Evropeiskogo Severa. Tekhnologii i ekonomika osvoeniya [Resources in the European North. Technology and Economy of Development]. No. 1, pp. 68-83. (In Russ.)
12. Rochev, K.V. (2014). [Assessment of the Quality of Labour and Financial Incentives in the University on the Basis of Systematic Approach Using Information from the Index System]. Voprosy upravleniya [Management Issues]. No. 12, pp. 60-70. (In Russ.)
13. Rochev, K.V. (2016) [About a Formula in Sociology]. Sotsiologiia obrazovaniya [Sociology of Education]. No. 2, pp. 91-96. (In Russ.)
14. Rochev, K.V., Korshunov, G.V. (2016). [The Formation of an Electronic Portfolio of the Graduates on the Basis of Inter-Actions with Employers on Creation of the Competitive Environment of Students and Increase Student Activity]. Obrazovatelnye tekhnologii i obshchestvo [Educational Technology and Society]. Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 498-513. (In Russ.)
Review
Views:
300
Email this article 