TRIPLE HELIX MODEL, NOVEL STATE EDUCATIONAL STANDARDS AND EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS AT THE UNIVERSITIES OF RUSSIA
Abstract
The Triple Helix model is that the potential for innovation and economic development in a Knowledge Society lies in a more prominent role for the university and in the hybridization of elements from university, industry and government to generate new institutional and social formats for the production, transfer and application of knowledge. This vision encompasses not only the creative destruction that appears as a natural innovation dynamics (Schumpeter, 1942), but also the creative renewal that arises within each of the three institutional spheres of university, industry and government, as well as at their intersections. The problem of interaction of the state, business and scientific community is actualized on the basis of recognition the system lagging of social and economic development of Russia from the other countries. This is confirmed by very modest positions taken by Russia in various international ratings. The possible solution of this problem in a format of «a social triangle of action » is offered: public-private partnership in case of implementation of investment projects, use of «Triple Helix» model in case of implementation of innovative projects and staffing based on professional educational standards of the new generation.
Keywords
инновационная стратегия России,
кадровый потенциал,
модель «тройной спирали »,
научно-педагогическая школа,
федеральные государственные образовательные стандарты,
экономика России,
innovative strategy of Russia,
personnel potential,
«Triple Helix» model,
scientific and pedagogical community,
federal state educational standards,
economy of Russia
About the Author
Valery P. Shestak
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Dezhina, I.G. (2016). [Demand for Russian Science: The Reflection in the Strategic Documents of the Country]. Journal of Russia’s Economic Development [Studies on Russian Economic Development] Vol. 23. No. 2, pp. 93R96. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
2. Etzkovitz, H., Leydcsdorff, L. (2000). The Dynamic of Innovations: From National System and «Mode 2» to a Triple Helix of UniversityRIndustryRGovernment Relations. Research Policy. Vol. 29, pp. 109R123.
3. Shestak, V.P. (2016). [Economic and Technological Space of Russia]. Vestnik obrazovaniya i razvitiya nauki RAEN [Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences]. No. 1, pp. 58R62. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
4. Shestak, V.P. (2016). [PublicRPrivate Partnerships, «Triple Helix» and Corporate Social Responsibility]. Vestnik Finuniversiteta [Bulletin of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation]. No. 4, pp. 6R16. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. Shestak, V.P., Kuznetsov, N.V. (2016). [Infrastructure Monopolies in the EconomicRTechnological Environment of Russia]. Trudy vol’nogo ekonomicheskogo obchestva Rossii [Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russian Federation]. No. 1, pp. 452R466. (In Russ.)
6. Fadeev, A.S, Gerdi, V.K, Baltyan, V.R., Fedorov, V.G. (2016). [The Integration of Education, Science, and Industry: The Model of Bauman University]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 4 (200), pp. 55R63. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Klemeshev, A.P., Kuksa, I.Yu. (2016). [Administration of Academic Programmes as a Factor of University Modernization]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 5. (201), pp. 10–20. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. Bolotov, V.A., Motova, G.N., Navodnov, V.G., Ryzhakova, O.E. (2016). [A New Conceptual Approach Towards Selecting the Best Educational Programmes]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 11 (206), pp. 5–16. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9. Pilipenko, S.A, Zhidkov, A.A., Karavaeva, E.V., Serova, A.A. (2016). [On the Correlation Between Federal Educational Standards of Higher Education and Professional Standards: Problems, Possible Approaches, Recommendation on Actualization]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 6, pp. 5R15. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
10. Korchagin, E.A., Safin, R.S. (2016). [Competence Approach and the Traditional View on Higher Education]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 11 (206), pp. 47R54. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
11. UNESCO Science Report «Towards 2030», 2015. Available at: http://en.unesco.org/unesco_science_report
12. Shestak, V.P. (2016). [Investment Projects of Russia and the Universities, part 1]. Ekonomika obrazovaniya, [Economics of Education]. No. 2 (93), pp. 103R115 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
13. Shestak, V.P. (2016). [Investment Projects of Russia and the Educational Programms, part 2]. Ekonomika obrazovaniya, [Economics of Education]. No. 4, pp. 39R53 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
Review
Views:
843
Email this article 