PEER REVIEW IN UNIVERSITY COURSES
Abstract
References
1. Artyushina, I.A., Shutilin, V.A. (2008). [Global Ratings on the Agenda]. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies]. No. 2, pp. 240R259. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
2. Larionova, M.V. (2011). [Comparative Analysis of Universities’ Research Capacity Assessment Practices]. Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsiy. [Bulletin of International Organizations] No. 1, pp. 4R28.
3. Robotova, A.S. (2016). [Scientific and Pedagogical Reviewing: Big Problems of a Small Genre]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 8R9 (204), pp. 142R148. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
4. Kolbe, A.S. (2015). [Technology MOOC in FullRTime Courses: Scope Peer Method]. Novyye informatsionnyye tekhnologii v avtomatizirovannykh sistemakh. [New Information Technologies in Automated Systems] No. 18, pp. 435R439. (In Russ.)
5. Belyayeva, I.S. (2013). [Method «Peer Review» as an Integral Part of Communication Oriented Technology of Foreign Language Teaching in NonRlanguage Universities]. Monitoring kachestva i soderzhaniya obrazovaniya v uchebnom zavedenii. Materialy dokladov zaochnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. [Monitoring Quality and Contents of Education in Educational Institutions: Proceedings of Correspondence ScientificRPractical Conference. Quality Management Center of Tver State Technical University], pp. 21R24. (In Russ.)
6. Ponomareva, T.M., Alekseeva, E.Yu. (2015). [The Stimulating Function of the Estimation Results of the Educational Process at the University]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Modern Problems of Science and Education]. No.1R1. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Pol’din, O.V., Yudkevich, M.M. (2011). [Effects of CoRTeaching in Higher Education: Overview of Theoretical and Empirical Approaches]. Voprosy obrazovaniya. [Educational Studies]. No. 4, pp. 106R123. (In Russ.)