Preview

Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia

Advanced search

PEER REVIEW IN UNIVERSITY COURSES

Abstract

The article presents the experience of using the method of peer review by higher school students. One of the common definitions of peer review is a «mutual assessment» and «assessment of colleagues». Peer review is used in various spheres, including education (especially remote, online-education). On the basis of the reviews prepared by the students after the completion of the course «Sociology of Employment» (2013-2015), the author analyzes the possibilities and limitations of this method. The advantages of the method are the reflection of the task and requirements to its fulfilling, the greater responsibility, the better quality ofanalytic work, objectivity in assessment ofcolleagues' intellectual product, mastering of academic writing. Nevertheless, the positive effect of peer review in the organization of individual work may be reduced by excessive labour input in its implementation. The author offers advice on the implementation of the mutual review into the practice of teaching and the organization of higher school students' individual study.

About the Author

Vera S. Kharchenko
Ural State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation


References

1. Artyushina, I.A., Shutilin, V.A. (2008). [Global Ratings on the Agenda]. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies]. No. 2, pp. 240R259. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

2. Larionova, M.V. (2011). [Comparative Analysis of Universities’ Research Capacity Assessment Practices]. Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsiy. [Bulletin of International Organizations] No. 1, pp. 4R28.

3. Robotova, A.S. (2016). [Scientific and Pedagogical Reviewing: Big Problems of a Small Genre]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 8R9 (204), pp. 142R148. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

4. Kolbe, A.S. (2015). [Technology MOOC in FullRTime Courses: Scope Peer Method]. Novyye informatsionnyye tekhnologii v avtomatizirovannykh sistemakh. [New Information Technologies in Automated Systems] No. 18, pp. 435R439. (In Russ.)

5. Belyayeva, I.S. (2013). [Method «Peer Review» as an Integral Part of Communication Oriented Technology of Foreign Language Teaching in NonRlanguage Universities]. Monitoring kachestva i soderzhaniya obrazovaniya v uchebnom zavedenii. Materialy dokladov zaochnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. [Monitoring Quality and Contents of Education in Educational Institutions: Proceedings of Correspondence ScientificRPractical Conference. Quality Management Center of Tver State Technical University], pp. 21R24. (In Russ.)

6. Ponomareva, T.M., Alekseeva, E.Yu. (2015). [The Stimulating Function of the Estimation Results of the Educational Process at the University]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Modern Problems of Science and Education]. No.1R1. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

7. Pol’din, O.V., Yudkevich, M.M. (2011). [Effects of CoRTeaching in Higher Education: Overview of Theoretical and Empirical Approaches]. Voprosy obrazovaniya. [Educational Studies]. No. 4, pp. 106R123. (In Russ.)


Review

Views: 348


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-3617 (Print)
ISSN 2072-0459 (Online)