APPLICATION OF CDIO APPROACH TO MSC AND PHD ENGINEERING PROGRAMS
Abstract
The paper presents two-level lists of intended learning outcomes in the MSc’s programs (FCDI Syllabus v1) and PhD programs (FFCD Syllabus v1) on the analogy with the CDIO Syllabus v2 for graduates of basic engineering education programs based on the analysis of generalized requirements of national and international standards for competences acquired by graduates of Master’s degree programs (MSc-programs) and postgraduate programs (PhDprograms) in the field of engineering, technology and technical sciences, taking into account the expert opinion of specific features and priority directions in innovation and research engineering activity. Standards of MSc educational programs (FCDI Standards) and PhD educational programs (FFCD Standards) are developed with a focus on FCDI Syllabus v1 and FFCD Syllabus v1 on the analogy with the CDIO Standards for the basic engineering education programs. The developed lists of competencies of graduates and standards of MSc and PhD educational programs may be subject to further development and detailing in higher educational institutions.
About the Authors
A. I. Chuchalin
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexandr I. Chuchalin – Dr. Sci. (Engineering), Prof., Head of the Department of Engineering Pedagogy.
Address: 30, Lenin Avenue, Tomsk, 634050
N. V. Daneikina
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia V. Daneikina – Postgraduate student, Department of Engineering Pedagogy.
Address: 30, Lenin Avenue, Tomsk, 634050
References
1. Rethinking Engineering Education. The CDIO Approach / E. Crawley, J. Malmqvist, S. Ostlund, D. Brodeur, K. Edström. Springer, 2014. 311 p.
2. Чучалин А. И. О применении подхода CDIO для проектирования уровневых программ инженерного образования // Высшее образование в России. 2016. № 4. С. 17–32. [Chuchalin, A.I. (2016). Application of the CDIO Approach to Three Level Engineering Programs Design. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 4, pp. 17-32. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)]
3. EURACE Framework Standards and Guidelines. European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education. URL: http:// www. enaee.eu/eurL aceLsystem/eurLaceLframeworkLstandards
4. Byrne, J., Jorgensen, T., Loukkola, T. (2013). Quality Assurance in Doctoral Education – Results of the ARDE Project. EUA Publications, 58 p.
5. Hansen, H.N., Grave, A. De. Graduate and PhD Course on Design and Manufacture of Micro Mechanical Systems. In: Proc. 7th International CDIO Conference, DTU, Denmark, 2011.
6. Andersson, P.H., Hussmann, P.M., Høyer, M., Vigild, M.E. Strategies for Lifting an Iceberg – Full Scale Adoption of CDIO. In: Proc. 8th International CDIO Conference, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 2012.
7. Karltun, A., Berglund, M. Supporting Engineering Innovation and Design by a Multidisciplinary Master’s Program. In: Proc. 9th International CDIO Conference, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2013.
8. Karltun, J., McIlroy, C., Eriksson, L. Joint Context-sharing Introductory Course for Four Different Master Programs. In: Proc. 10th International CDIO Conference, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, 2014.
9. Wei, W., Li, L., He, J., Xie, M. Differentiating Instruction of CDIO: In Layered Curriculum and Course View. In: Proc. 10th International CDIO Conference, UPC, Barcelona, Spain, 2014.
10. Fortin, C., Yue, S., Zhao, F., Lemarquis, J.-P., Packwood, K., Kokkolaras, M. A New CDIOBased Training Program for Advanced Degrees in Aerospace Engineering. In: Proc. 10th International CDIO Conference, UPC, Barcelona, Spain, 2014.
11. Malmqvist, J., Hugo, R., Kjellberg, M. A Survey of CDIO Implementation Globally – Effects on Educational Quality. In: Proc. 11th International CDIO Conference, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China, 2015.
12. Li, Yo., Wu, F., Wang, J., Wang, Ju. Reform Practice Based on the Concept of CDIO in Mechanical Engineering Professional Degree Postgraduate Education. In: Proc. 11th International CDIO Conference, Chengdu, China, 2015.
13. Antokhina, J., Olenev, V., Sheynin, Y. CDIO Implementation Experience for the Masters Training at SUAI. In: Proc. 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland, 2016.
14. Carstensen, A.-K., Bernhard, J. Design Science Research as an Approach for Engineering Education Research. In: Proc. 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland, 2016.
15. Chuchalin, A., Daneikina, N., Fortin, C. (2016) Application of CDIO Approach to Engineering BEng, MSc and PhD Programs Design and Implementation. In: Proc. 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku, Finland, Turku University of Applied Sciences, pp. 805–815.
16. Xiang, J.-h., Zhang, C.-l., Gan, Z.-j., Liu, G.-y., Zhou, C., Chen, C.-g. Discussion on the Training Mode of Engineering Masters of School-Enterprise Associate Laboratory. In: Proc. 2015 International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education.
Review
Views:
574
Email this article 