WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO THINK PEDAGOGICALLY TODAY?
Abstract
The paper presents a commentary on the article “Pedagogical knowledge and a scholarly text reflecting it in the realities of the “semiological turn” (a dialogue with A.A. Polonnikov)” by A.V. Korzhuyev and N.N. Antonova. The author analyzes the basic metaphors constituting the current pedagogical discourse and discusses the issue concerning the linking between pedagogical research and pedagogical practice. The paper comes to a conclusion about their inseparable unity, as well as about the multiplicity of research forms and pedagogies immanent to them. The author introduces an idea of the modern pedagogical thinking. Its main characteristic is the change of self-consciousness of the pedagogical language as a leading condition of educational relationships’ operation and development.
About the Author
A. A. POLONNIKOV
Belarusian State University, Minsk
Belarus
Belarus
Cand. Sci. (Psychology), Assoc. Prof., Deputy Head of the Center for the Development of Education Problems of the Main Directorate of educational, scientific and methodical work
References
1. Melosik, Z., Szkudlarek, T. (2009). Kultura, tożsamość i edukacja: migotanie znaczeń [Culture, Identity and Education: the Shimmering of Meanings]. Krakow: Impuls Publ., 111 p. (In Polish)
2. Lyotard, J.-F. (1998) Sostoyanie postmoderna [The Postmodern Condition: A report on Knowledge]. Translated from French. Moscow: Aleteiya Publ.; St. Petersburg: Institute of Sociological Studies Publ., 231 p. (In Russ.)
3. Foucault, M. (2002). Arkheologiya znaniya [Archeology of Knowledge]. Transl. from French. Kiev: Nika-Centr Publ., 208 p. (In Russ.)
4. Kuhn, T. S. (1978). Zamechaniya na stat’yu I. Lakatosa [Remarks on the Article of I. Lakatos]. In: Struktura i razvitie nauki. (Iz Bostonskikh issledovanii po filosofii nauki) [Structure and Development of Science. (From Boston Studies on the Philosophy of Science)]. Transl. from English. Moscow: Progress Publ., pp. 270–283. (In Russ.)
5. Man de, P. (1999). Allegorii chteniya: Figural’nyi yazyk Russo, Nitsshe, Ril’ke i Prusta [Allegories of Reading: Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust]. Transl.ated from English. Ekaterinburg: Ural. University Press, pp. 270–283. (In Russ.)
6. Wittgenstein, L. (2005) Izbrannye raboty [Selected Works]. Trans. from German. Moscow: Territoriya bu-dushchego Publ., 440 p. (In Russ.)
7. Rorty, R. (1997). Filosofiya i zerkalo prirody [Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature]. Transl. from English. Novosibirsk: Novosib. Univ. Press, 320 p. (In Russ.)
8. Stepin, V.S. (2009) [Classics, Non-Classical, Post-Non-Classical: Discerning Criteria]. In: Postneklassika: filosofiya, nauka, kul’tura [Post-Classics: Philosophy, Science, Culture]. St. Petersburg: Mir Publ., pp. 249-295. (In Russ.)
9. Schütz, A. (2004) Izbrannoe: Mir, svetyashchiisya smyslom [Selected: A World Shining with Meaning]. Transl. from German & English. Moscow: Rossiiskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya Publ., 1056 p. (In
10. Russ.)
11. Wertsch, J.V. (1996). Golosa razuma. Sotsiokul’turnyi podkhod k oposredovannomu deistviyu [Voices of the Mind. Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action]. Transl. from Eng. Moscow: Trivola Publ., 176 p. (In Russ.)
12. Domanska, E. (2007) «Zwrot performatywny» we współczesnej humanistyce [«Performative Turn» in Contemporary Humanities]. Teksty drugie [Other texts]. No. 5, pp. 48–60. (In Polish)
13. Gumbrecht, H.U. (2006). [Ice Embraces of “Scientific”, or Why is it Preferable for Humanities to be “Humanities and Arts]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Review]. No. 81, pp. 201–223. (In Russ.)
14. White, H. (2002). Metaistoriya: istoricheskoe voobrazhenie v Evrope XIX v. [Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe]. Transl. from Eng. Ekaterinburg: Ural. University Press, 528 p. (In Russ.)
15. Ankersmit, F. R. (2003). Narrativnaya logika. Semanticheskii analiz yazyka istorikov [The Narrative Logic. A Semantic Analysis of the Historian’s Language]. Transl. from Eng. Moscow: Ideya Press, 360 p. (In Russ.
16. Szkudlarek, T. (2009). Wiedza i wolność w pedagogice amerykańskiego postmodernismu [Knowledge and Freedom in the Pedagogy of American Postmodernism]. Krakow: Impuls Publ., 246 p. (In Polish)
17. Sartre, J.-P. (1994). Problemy metoda [Problems of the Method]. Transl. from French. Moscow: Progress Publ., 240 p. (In Russ.)
18. Korzhuev, A. V., Antonova, N. N. (2018). [Pedagogical Knowledge and its Representation in Scientific Text in Conditions of a “Semiological Turn” (Dialogue with A.A. Polonnikov)]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 1 (219), pp. 70-78. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
19. Szkudlarek T. (2008). Dyskursywna konstrukcja podmiotowości. «Puste znaczące» a pedagogika kultury [The Discursive Construction of Subjectivity. «Empty Significant» and Pedagogy of Culture]. Forum oświatowe. Numer specjalny. [Educational forum. Special number], pp. 125-139. (In Polish)
20. Sartre, J.-P. (1989). Ekzistentsializm – eto gumanizm [Existentialism is a Humanism]. In: Sumerki bogov [Twilight of the Gods]. Transl. from French. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., pp. 319–344. (In Russ.)
21. Shchittsova, T. (2000). Fenomen vospitaniya i nauka o vospitanii v tvorchestve Finka. Predislovie k pub-likatsii [The Phenomenon of Upbringing and the Science of Education in the Work of Fink. Preface to Publication]. Topos [Topos]. No. 2, pp. 38-40. (In Russ.)
22. Żyżek, S. (2001). Przeklęstwo fantazji [Curse of Fantasy]. Wroclaw: Wroclaw University Press, 267 p. (In Polish)
23. Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. New York: Monthly Review Press, 253 p.
24. Lotman, Yu. M. (2004) Semiosfera [Semiosphere]. St. Petersburg: Iskusstvo-SPB Publ., 704 p. (In Russ.)
25. Gооdman, N. (1990). Metafora – rabota po sovmestitel’stvu [Metaphor as Moonlighting]. In: Teoriya metafory [Theory of Metaphor]. Moscow: Progress Publ., pp. 194-200. (In Russ.).
26. Szkudlarek, T. (2012). Tożsamość [Identity]. In: Dyskursywna konstrukcja podmiotu. Przyczynek do re-konstrukcji pedagogiki kultury [The Discursive Structure of the Subject. A Contribution to the Reconstruction of Culture Pedagogy]. Gdansk: UG Press, pp. 88-161. (In Polish)
27. Klus-Stanska, D. (2016). Gdy słowa wiodą na manowce. Krótka rzecz o pułapce polskiej metodyki [Where Words Lead Astray. A short piece about the trap of Polish teaching methodology]. Problemy Wczesnej Edukacji [Issues in Early Education]. No. 2(33), pp. 9-22. (In Polish)
28. Beszczad, B. (2013). Pedagogika i język [Pedagogy and Language]. Krakow: Jagiellonian University Press, 214 p. (In Polish)
29. Ejsmont, M., Kosmalska, B. (2009). Pomiędzy ładem a chaosem. Szkoła – media – popkultura w edukacji europejskiej [Between Order and Chaos. School – Media – Pop-culture in European Education]. Gdansk: Ateneum-Szkoła Wyższa Press, 338 p. (In Polish)
Review
Views:
399
Email this article 