Preview

Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia

Advanced search

MODERN STRATEGIES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE AND RESEARCHERS TRAINING: INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE

Abstract

Strategies for the development of science, technology and innovations at the turn of the 20th and 19th centuries, which assumed that the success of introducing innovations automatically leads to the growth of production, wages, and job, creating the conditions for subsequent investment, at present are subject to revision. The reason is not only the global crisis of the 2000s that led to the stagnation of science funding and to changes in its financing by the state, local authorities, business and outsourcing, but also longer-term trends in the development of modern society, in particular, the formation of the academic precariat, the attraction of scientific personnel to traditional centres of innovation (despite funding), and others. These trends are analysed in the article, as well as their implementation in the United States, the EU and China; the analysis is based on laws and other normative acts regulating R&D in those countries, as well as on statistical data. The main measures to support science and its development taken by governments and scientific centres of those countries are analysed. The article highlights major risks for modern science human resources development, that are associated with: (1) adequacy of personnel and their training for specific directions and research (for the difficulty of forecasting the staffing needs of specific areas of science and technologies); (2) high and multi-directional “entry requirements” for research activities; (3) the motivation for choosing an academic career (because of precarious nature of employment and wage fluctuations); (4) selection of the strategy for the development of science in the face of an increasing share of private funding, tough competition and focus on quick return; (5) commercialization of scientific research; (6) dilemmas of globalization (openness versus know-how, etc.).

About the Authors

Yu. D. Artamonova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Yulia D. Artamonova – Cand. Sci. (Philosophy), Assoc. Prof., Faculty of Political Science

1, Leninskiye Gory, Moscow, 1199911



A. L. Demchuk
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Artur L. Demchuk – Cand. Sci. (Philosophy), Assoc. Prof., Faculty of Political Science

1, Leninskiye Gory, Moscow, 1199911



A. N. Karneyev
Lomonosov Moscow State University; Institute of Asian and African Studies
Russian Federation

Andrei N. Karneyev Cand. Sci. (Philosophy), Assoc. Prof.

11-1, Mokhovaya str., Moscow, 125009



V. V. Safonova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Victoria V. Safonova – Dr. Sci. (Education), Prof., Faculty of Foreign Languages and Regional Studies

1/13-14, Leninskie gory, Moscow, 119991



References

1. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Cotemporary Societies. London: Sage. 191 p.

2. Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix – University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development (January 1, 1995). EASST Review. Vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 14-19. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2480085 (accessed 10.03.2018)

3. Lisbon European Council. 23 and 24 March 2000. Presidency conclusions. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lis1_en.htm (accessed 10.03.2018)

4. Sursock, A., Smidt, H. (2010). Trends 2010: A decade of change in European Higher Education. EUA, 2010. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45812568_Trends_2010_A_Decade_of_Change_in_European_Higher_Education (accessed 10.03.2018)

5. A Strategy for American Innovation. Available at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/strategy_for_american_innovation_october_2015.pdf (accessed 10.03.2018)

6. Meiguo guojia kexue jijinhui lishihui: zhongguo keyan jingfei yi zhan quanqiu kaizhi de 20% [US National Science Foundation Governing Council: China’s Spending on Research is already 20% of the Global Spending on Science]. Zhongwen hulianwang shuju zixun zhongxin, 20.01.2016. Available at: http://www.199it.com/archives/431930.html (accessed 10.03.2018)

7. Lin, Li, Zhou, Pengfei, Wu, Aiping (2010). Zhongguo gaodeng jiaoyu xiaolь sunshi de xitong yanjiu [A Systematic Inquiry into the Falling Efficiency of the System of Higher Education in China]. Dalian, Zhongguo caizheng jingji chubanshe.

8. EUROPE 2020. A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20%20007%20-%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20version.pdf (accessed 10.03.2018)

9. Zhongguo keyan jingfei zhan GDP bizhong shoudu tupo 2% [Science and Research Expenditures in China surpassed 2% of GDP for the first time]. Zhongguo xinwen wang, 23.10.2014. Available at: http://www.chinanews.com/cj/2014/10-23/6711339.shtml (accessed 10.03.2018)

10. Zhao Zhuqing. Woguo guoji lunwen bei yinyong cishu shangsheng zhi shijie dier [The number of citations of the scientific papers by Chinese researches published internationally, raised to the second place in the world]. Kexuewang, 31.10.2017. Available at: http://news.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2017/10/392606.shtm (accessed 10.03.2018)

11. Doklad UNESCO po nauke: na puti k 2030 godu [UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030] (2016) Moscow: Izdatel’sky dom Magistr-Press Publ. 819 p. (In Russ.)

12. Guojia ziran kexue jijin: 2020 nian zhongguo keyan jingfei touru jiang ganshang meiguo [The State Natural Sciences Scientific Foundation: By the Year 2020 China will surpass the US in Research Expenditures]. Zhongwen hulianwang shuju zixun zhongxin, 15.06.2016. Available at: http://www.199it.com/archives/484239.html (accessed 10.03.2018)

13. Zhongdian daxue renjun keyan jingfei 100 qiang paihang bang! Jianyi shoucang [A List of the best 100 Chinese Universities in terms of per capita research expenditures has been published] Sohu.com, 12.04.2017. Available at: http://www.sohu.com/a/133494966_617765 (accessed 10.03.2018)

14. Inglehart, R. (2018) Kul’turnaya ehvolyuciya. Kak izmenyayutsya kul’turnye cennosti i kak ehto menyaet mir [Cultural Evolution. How People’s Motivations Are Changing and How This is Changing the World]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ. 348 p. (In Russ.)

15. Hardt, M., Negri, A. (2004) Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin Books. 448 p.

16. Standing, G. (2014) Precariat: novy opasny klass. [The Precariat. The New Dangerous Class]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press Publ. 328 p. (In Russ.)

17. G7 Science Ministry Ministers’ Communiqué. Available at: http://www.g7italy.it/sites/default/files/documents/G7%20Science%20Communiqu%C3%A9.pdf (accessed 10.03.2018)

18. Abramov, R.N. (2011). [Managerialism and Academic Profession. Conflict and Cooperation]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 7, pp. 37-47. (In Russ.)

19. Artamonova, Yu.D, Demchuk, A.L., Moiseeva V.V. (2013). [Postgraduate Education Network: Theory and Practice in Europe and Russia]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 2, pp. 138146. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)


Review

Views: 746


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-3617 (Print)
ISSN 2072-0459 (Online)