Engineering Education in the Epoch of Industrial Revolution and Digital Economy
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2018-27-10-47-62
Abstract
The paper presents a review of literature and other sources of information concerning the fourth industrial revolution and the development of the digital economy. The tasks of improving the education system including higher education and engineering training are actualized. The author analyzes the development of online technologies in education, as well as blended learning, combining the advantages of traditional and online education. The paper dwells on the peculiarities of training engineers and the best practices of applying blended learning in engineering education, shows the need to optimize blended learning by maximizing the benefits of traditional and online education. A technique for using the CDIO approach, further developed for engineering education of the top levels, is proposed for the optimal blended learning design of the Bachelor, Master and PhD programs. The author adduces the concrete examples, which show the possibility of digital transformation of engineering programs with the purpose of their actualization and improving the quality of graduates’ training for complex, innovative and research engineering activity.
About the Author
A. I. Chuchalin
Tomsk Polytechnic University; kuban State Technological University.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Engineering), Prof.
30, Lenin prosp., Tomsk, 634050; 2, bld. A, Moskovskaya str., krasnodar, 350072.
References
1. Schwab, К. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland, 184 p.
2. Digital Economy: Innovation, Growth and Social Prosperity. OECD Ministerial Meeting. Cancun, Mexico 21-23 June 2016. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/internet/ministeri- al/STI-Cancun-2016-ENG.pdf
3. Цифровая Россия: новая реальность. Digi- tal/McKinsey. ООО «Мак-Кинзи и Компания СиАйЭс», 2017. 132 с. [Digital Russia: The New Reality. Digital/McKinsey. (2017). McKinsey & Company LLC. 132 p. (In Russ.)]
4. Куприяновский В.П., Сухомлин В.А., До¬брынин А.П., Райков А.Н., Шкуров Ф.В., Дрожжинов В.И., Федорова Н.О., Намиот Д.Е. Навыки в цифровой экономике и вы¬зовы системы образования // International Journal of Open Information Technologies. 2017. № 1. С. 19-25. [Kupriyanovsky, V.P., Sukhomlin, V.A., Dobrynin, A.P., Raikov, A.N., Shkurov, F.V., Drozhzhinov, V.I., Fedorova, N.O., Namiot, D.E. (2017). Skills in the Digital Economy and the Challenges for the Education System. International Journal of Open Information Technologies. No. 1, pp. 19-25. (In Russ.)]
5. Кондаков А. Образование в эпоху четвёртой промышленной революции // Вести образо-вания. 2017. № 9 (147). [Kondakov, A. (2017). Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Vesti obrazovaniya = News of education. No. 9 (147). (In Russ.)]
6. Алексанков А.М. Четвёртая промышлен¬ная революция и модернизация образова¬ния: международный опыт // Стратегиче¬ские приоритеты. 2017. № 1 (13). С. 53-70. [Aleksakov, A.M. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Modernization of Education: International Experience. Strategicheskie prior- itety = Strategic Priorities. No. 1 (13), pp. 53-70. (In Russ.)]
7. Reis, J., Amorim, M., Melro, N., Matos, P. (2018). Digital Transformation: A Literature Review and Guidelines for Future Research. Springer In¬ternational Publishing AG 2018. Б. Rocha et al. (Eds.): WorldCIST’18 2018, AISC 745, pp. 1-11.
8. Higher Education in the Era of the Fourth Indus-trial Revolution. Gleason, Nancy. (Ed.). Springer Nature Singapore Pte. Ltd., 2018. 238 p.
9. Baran, E. (2013). Connect, Participate and Learn: Transforming Pedagogies in Higher Education. Bulletin of the IEEE Technical Committee on Learning Technology. Vol. 15. No. 1.
10. Kamp, A. Engineering Education in the Rap¬idly Changing World. Rethinking the Vision for Higher Engineering Education. 2nd Rev. Ed. TU Delft, June 2016.
11. Иванов В.Г., Кайбияйнен А.А., Мифта- хутдинова Л.Т. Инженерное образование в цифровом мире // Высшее образование в России. 2017. № 12 (218). С. 136-143. [Ivanov, V.G., Kaybiyaynen, A.A., Miftakhutdinova, L.T. (2017). Engineering Education in Digital World. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Educa¬tion in Russia. No. 12 (218), pp. 136-143. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)]
12. Александров А.А., Федоров И.Б., Медведев В.Е. Инженерное образование сегодня: про¬блемы и решения // Высшее образование в России. 2013. № 12. С. 3-8. [Alexandrov, A.A., Fedorov, I.B., Medvedev, V.E. (2013). Engineer¬ing Education Today: Problems and Solutions. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Educa¬tion in Russia. No. 12, pp. 3-8. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)]
13. Rauf, A.S., Daud, M.F., Said, M.N.H.B.M. MOOCs in Engineering Education - a literature review. Proceedings of the Regional Conference in Engineering Education 2016, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
14. Luskin, B. (2010). Think “Exciting”: E-Learning and the Big “E”. EDUCAUSE Review, March 3. Available at: https://er.educause.edu/ar- ticles/2010/3/think-exciting-elearning-and- the-big-e
15. McKeown, K. (2012). Can Online Learning Re-produce the Full College Experience? The Her-itage Foundation. Available at: https://www. heritage.org/education/report/can-online- learning-reproduce-the-full-college-experi- ence. March 13.
16. 2014 Comparison of Online vs. Traditional Learn¬ing. Available at: https://potomac.edu/learn- ing/online-learning-vs-traditional-learning/
17. Erstad, W. (2017). Online vs. Traditional Edu-cation: What You Need to Know. 8/16/2017. Available at: https://www.rasmussen.edu/ student-life/blogs/college-life/ online-vs-tra- ditional-education-answer-never-expected/
18. Miller, G. (2014). On-Campus vs. Online Degrees: Which One is Better? Available at: https://www. worldwidelearn.com/education-articles/on- line-vs-campus.htm. (Retrieved July 24).
19. Stewart, W. (2013). Outcome, Not Process, Matters in the On-Campus vs Online Education Debate. 2013/09/19. Available at: https://evoll- lution.com/opinions/outcome-process-matters- on-campus-vs-online-education-debate/
20. Ossiannilsson, E., Williams, K., Camilleri, A.F., Brown, M. (2015). Quality Models in Online and Open Education Around the Globe. State of the Art and Recommendations. International Council for Open and Distance Education. Oslo, Norway. 52 p.
21. Digital Transformation in Higher Educa¬tion. Navitas Ventures. Available at: https:// www.navitasventures.com/wp-content/up- loads/2017/08/HE-Digital-Transformation-_ Navitas_Ventures_-EN.pdf
22. Morshed, J. (2017). 5 Ways to Speed up Digital Transformation in Higher Education. Microsoft in Education. August 9. Available at: https:// educationblog.microsoft.com/2017/08/tips- digital-transformation-higher-ed/
23. Digital Transformation in Higher Education. VMware, Inc. 2017. Available at: https://www. vmware.com/content/dam/digitalmarketing/ vmware/en/pdf/solutions/industry/vmware- digital-transformation-in-higher-education.pdf
24. Complete Guide to Best Online Engineering De-grees. Available at: https://www.guidetoonlin- eschools.com/degrees/engineering
25. Online Studies. Available at: https://www.on- linestudies.com (Retrieved July 2018).
26. Brooks, Е., Morse, R. (2018).Methodology: Best Online Engineering Programs Rankings. Jan. 8. Available at: https://www.usnews.com/edu- cation/online-education/articles/engineering- methodology
27. Online Programs Accredited by ABET. Available at: http://www.abet.org/accreditation/new- to-accreditation/online-programs/#online
28. Online Program Wins Engineering Education Award. June 30, 2017. Available at: http:// news.mit.edu/ 2017/ mit-boeing-online-archi- tecture-and-systems-engineering-program- receives-award-excellence-engineering-edu- cation-0630
29. Вешнева И.В., Сингатулин Р.А. Трансфор¬мация образования: тенденции, перспективы // Высшее образование в России. 2016. № 2 (198). С. 142-147. [Veshneva, I.V., Singatulin, R.A. (2016). Transformation of the Education System: Reasons, Tendencies, Perspectives. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 2 (198), pp. 142-147. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)]
30. Richert, A., Shehadeh, M., Willicks, F., Jeschke, S. (2016). Digital Transformation of Engineering Education - Empirical Insights from Virtual Worlds and Human-Robot-Collaboration. In-ternational Journal of Engineering Pedagogy. Vol. 6. No. 4.
31. Захарченко Е.А., Тумакова Н.А. К вопро¬су о проблемах и перспективах дистанци¬онного инженерного образования // Мо¬лодой учёный. Педагогика. 2015. № 8 (88). [Zakharchenko, E.A., Tumakova, N.A. (2015). On the Problems and Prospects of Distance Engineering Education. Molodoi uchyonyi. Pedagogika = Young Scientist. Pedagogy. No. 8 (88). (In Russ.)
32. Douglas, K.T., Ionescu, D., Petrolito, J., Maina- li, B. (2016). Is Blended Learning the Answer to Enhance Learning of Engineering Students? Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Education and Research, 21-24 November School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
33. Graham, R. (2018). The Global State of the Art in Engineering Education. Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology, Cambridge, MA, USA. 163 p.
34. Alammary, A., Sheard, J., Carbone, A. (2014). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Three Different Design Approaches. Australasian Jour-nal of Educational Technology. No. 30(4).
35. Brown, M.G. (2015). Mapping the Study of Blended Learning in Engineering Education. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposi¬tion, June 14-17, 2015, ASEE, Seattle, US.
36. Charitopoulos, A., Vassiliadis, S., Rangoussi, M., Koulouriotis, D. (2017). E-learning and Blended Learning in Textile Engineering Education: A Closed Feedback Loop Approach. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 17th World Textile Conference AUTEX 2017 - Tex¬tiles - Shaping the Future, 29-31 May 2017 on the island ofCorfu, Greece.
37. Harris, J., Park, C. (2016). A Case Study on Blended Learning in Engineering Education. Proc. of the Canadian Engineering Education Association Conference, June 19-22, Dalhousie University, Canada.
38. Rahman, A. (2016). A Blended Learning Ap-proach to Teach Fluid Mechanics in Engineer¬ing. European Journal of Engineering Educa¬tion. Vol. 42. No. 3, pp. 252-259.
39. Shrestha, S. (2015). Implementation of Blended Learning Strategies in a Core Civil Engineering Subject: An Experience. (Eds: A. Oo, A. Patel, T. Hilditch, S. Chandran). Proc. 26th Annual Conf. of the Australasian Association for Engi¬neering Education - AAEE 2015, 6-9 Decem¬ber, Geelong, Australia.
40. Ahrens, A., Zascerinska, J., Andreeva, N. (2018). Engineering Students’ Blended Learning in High-er Education. Proc. Int. Sci. Conf. “Society. In-tegration. Education”, May 25-26. Vol. I. Reze- kne Academy ofTechnology, Latvija.
41. 4TU Centre for Engineering Education. Avail¬able at: https://www.4tu.nl/cee/en/ (Retrieved July 2018).
42. Чучалин А.И. Цели и результаты освоения про-фессиональных образовательных программ // Высшее образование в России. 2014. № 2. C. 5-16. [Chuchalin, A.I. (2014). Academic Program Objectives and Learning Outcomes. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 2, pp. 5-16. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)]
43. Леган М.В., Яцевич Т.А. Комбинированная модель обучения студентов на базе системы дистанционного обучения // Высшее образо-вание в России. 2014. №4. С. 136-140. [Legan, M.V., Yatsevich T.A. (2014). Implementation of Blended Learning Model Based on Distance Learning System. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 4, pp. 136-140. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)]
44. Jones, L.J.N., Chew, E. (2014). Blended Learning in Engineering Education: Curricu¬lum Redesign and Development. In: Tang S., Logonnathan L. (Eds) Taylor’s 7th Teach¬ing and Learning Conference Proceedings. Springer, Singapore.
45. Liyanapathirana, S., Mirza, O. (2016). Blended Learning in Engineering Education: Students’ and Lecturers’ Perceptions and Achieving Learning Outcomes (Eds: A. Rahman, V. Ilic) Proc. Int. Conf. on Engineering Education and Research, 21-24 November, Western Sydney University, Parramatta Campus, Sydney, Australia.
46. van Puffelen, E.A.M. (2017). Designing Blended Engineering Courses. Proc. 45th SEFI Annual Conference, 18-21 September, Azores, Portugal.
47. Айдрус И.А.-З, Асмятуллин Р.Р. Мировой опыт использования технологий дистанци¬онного образования // Высшее образование в России. 2015. № 5. С. 139-145. [Aidrous, I., Asmyatullin, R.R. (2015). World Experience in Usage of Distance Learning Technologies. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 5, pp. 139-145. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)]
48. Велединская С.Б., Дорофеева М.Ю. Смешан¬ное обучение: технология проектирования учебного процесса // Открытое и дистан-ционное образование. 2015. № 2. С. 12-19. [Veledinskaya, S.B, Dorofeeva, M.Yu. (2015). Blended Learning: Technology of Designing the Educational Process. Otkrytoe i distantsionnoe obrazovanie = Open and Distance Education. No. 2, pp. 12-19. (In Russ.)]
49. Переосмысление инженерного образования. Подход CDIO / Э.Ф. Кроули, Й. Малмквист, С. Остлунд, Д. Р. Бродер, К. Эдстрем; пер. с англ. С. Рыбушкиной; под науч. ред. А. Чу- чалина. М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы эконо¬мики, 2015. 504 с. [Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., Brodeur, D., Edstrqm, K. Rethinking Engineering Education, the CDIO Approach, Second Edition. Springer, 2014].
50. Chuchalin, A. (2018). Evolution of the CDIO approach: BEng, MSc and PhD level. European Journal of Engineering Education. Published online: 04 Jan 2018.
51. Чучалин А.И. Модернизация трёхуровне¬вого высшего образования на основе ФГОС 3++ и CDIO ++ // Высшее образование в России. 2018. Т. 27 № 4. C. 22-32. [Chuchalin, A.I. (2018). Modernization of the Three-Cycle Engineering Education Based on FSES 3++ and CDIO++. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27. No. 4, pp. 22-32. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)]
Review
Views:
1212
Email this article 