Teaching Academic English Corpus Trough Word-formation

Classical elements permeate global academic discourse and scientific terminology. Understanding the meanings and functioning of these elements can help multilingual scholars cope with disciplinary literature and write for publication and is therefore essential in teaching English for academic and specific purposes. However, few manuals on academic vocabulary explore word-formation in-depth or use it as a tool to alleviate learning through analysis and synthesis rather than memorizing words. Russian, as many other European languages, is a synthetic language in which affixation is as productive as in Latin. The paper presents a well-designed and approbated course of academic vocabulary for social scientists, analyses relationships between linguistic studies and teaching academic vocabulary, and discusses the ways of increasing the effectiveness and clarity of teaching by more systematic study of classical elements, enhancing students’ analytical skills through innovative methodology and using the advantages of similarities between Russian and Latin word-formation. Comparative analysis demonstrates that the key features of the course, such as interactive computer-based visual materials and various analytical tasks involving students’ background knowledge and academic awareness, help students not only decipher unknown words, but also produce neologisms, which is essential in coping with new terminology. Published as a book, Academic Vocabulary for Social Sciences is now available for teachers, students and researchers as a resource for study and self-study. The effectiveness of the approach demonstrates that it can be used as a model to design similar specific vocabulary courses for students of other synthetic languages.

1. Adams, V. (2013). An Introduction to Modern English Word-formation. London: Routledge: Taylor and Francis Group.

2. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague : Mouton. 118 p.

3. Green, T.M. (2015). The Greek and Latin Roots of English. 5th ed. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. 304 p.

4. Menzel, K., Degaetano-Ortlieb, S. (2017). The diachronic development of combining forms in scientific writing. Lege Artis: Language Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. Vol. II, no. 2, pp. 185–249.

5. Kastovsky, D. (2009). Astronaut, astrology, astrophysics: About combining forms, classical compounds and affixoids. In: Selected Proceedings of the 2008 Symposium on New Approaches in English Historical Lexis (HEL-LEX), Lammi, Finland, 25–28 April 2008. Pp. 1–13.

6. Hacken, P., Panocová, R. (2014). Neoclassical formatives in dictionaries. In: Proceeding of the 16th EURALEX International Congress, Bolzano, Italy, 15–19 July, 2014. Pp. 1059–1072.

7. Korotkina, I.B. (2016). Academic Vocabulary for Social Sciences. Moscow: HSE Publishing House. 301 p.

8. Scarcella, R. (2003). Academic English: A Conceptual Framework. Technical Reports, University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute, UC Berkeley. Available at: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/6pd082d4 (Accessed 9 January 2018).

9. Hyland, К. (2016). Teaching and Researching Writing. New York and London: Routledge, 314 p.

10. Murray, N., Kirton, B. (2006). An Analysis of the Current Situation. In: S. Davies, D. Swinburne and G. Williams (Eds.) Writing Matters: The Royal Literary Fund Report on Student Writing in Higher Education. London: The Royal Literary Fund. Pp. 7–13.

11. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London, Longman. 232 p.

12. Flowerdew, J. (2013). English for research publication purposes. In: B. Paltridge, S. Starfield (Eds). The handbook of English for specific purposes. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Pp. 301–321.

13. Cargill, M., Burgess, S. (Eds.) (2017). Publishing Research in English as an Additional Language: Practices, Pathways and Potentials. University of Adelaide Press. 277 p.

14. Lillis, T., Curry, M.J. (2015). The politics of English, language and uptake. AILA Review, Vol. 28. P. 127–150. Available at: https://benjamins. com/catalog/aila.28.06lil/fulltext/aila.28.06lil. pdf

15. Korotkina, I.B. (2018). Russian Scholarly Publications in the Anglophone Academic Discourse: The Clash of Tyrannosaurs. Integratsiya obrazovaniya = Integration of Education. Vol. 22. No. 2. Pp. 311–323.

16. McCarthy, M., O’Dell, F. (2008). Academic Vocabulary in Use. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. 176 p.

17. Ayers, D.M. (1986). English Words from Latin and Greek elements. University of Arizona Press. 290 p.

18. Draze, D. (2005). Red Hot Root Words: Mastering Vocabulary with Prefixes, Suffixes and Root Words (Book 2). Prufrock Press. 68 p.

19. Callella, T. (2004). The Learning Works: Prefixes and Suffixes, Grades 4-8: Teaching Vocabulary to Improve Reading Comprehension. Creative Teaching Press. 144 p.

20. Levine, H., Levine, N., Levine, R. (2003). Vocabulary for the College Bound Student. 4th edition. Amsco School Publications. 340 p.

21. Янутик С.Я. Латинские аффиксы в системе знаменательных частей речи английского языка // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. 2016. №2-1 (56). С. 178– 180 [Yanutik, S.Y. (2016). Latin Affixes in the System of Nominal Parts of Speech of the English Language. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki = Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice, No. 2-1 (56). Pp. 178–180 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)]

22. Гвишиани Н.В. Современный английский язык: Лексикология. М.: Академия, 2009. 221 с. [Gvishiani, N.B. (2009). Modern English Lexicology: Vocabulary in Use. Moscow: Akademiya Publ. 221 p. (In Russ.)]

23. Янутик С.Я., Аматов А.М. Словообразовательный потенциал префиксов латинского происхождения // Научные ведомости Белгородского государственного университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки. 2017. Т. 34. №14 (263). С. 76–83 [Yanutik, S.Y., Amatov, A.M. (2017). Derivational Potential in Prefixes of Latin Origin. Nauchniye Vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki = Belgorod State Univ. Scientific Bulletin. Humanities Sciences. Vol. 34. No. 14 (263). Pp. 76–83 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)]

24. Зубенко И.В., Маснева И.Е. Морфемное словообразование в латинском и английском языках // Язык и культура. 2002. №2. С. 86–90 [Zubenko, I.V., Masneva, I.E. (2002). Morphemic Word-formation in Latin and English. Yazyk i Kul’tura = Language and Culture. No. 2. Pp. 86–90. (In Russ.)]

25. Кондратьев Д.К. Латынь в современном мире // Журнал Гродненского государственного медицинского университета. 2007. №4. С. 170–173 [Kondratyev, D.K. (2007). Latin in the modern world. Zhurnal Grodnenskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta = Journal of the Grodno State Medical University. No. 4. Pp. 170–173. (In Russ.)]

26. Levine, H. (1965). Vocabulary for the College Bound Student. Amsco School Publications. 320 p.