Knowledge Visualization Centers and University Infographics: International and Domestic Experience
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-7-114-124
Abstract
Infographics as a young science of converting massive volumes of knowledge into concise emergent visualizations, i.e. the methodology that works with transcoded knowledge, has become capable, at the digital stage of its own evolution, to integrate the most diverse fields of knowledge. This is possible due to the advantages that the graphic language provides along with all other ways of expressing and formalizing knowledge. The potentials of infographics for the university environment provide an opportunity to visually operate with vast volumes of knowledge, to search for new interdisciplinary nexus-points and heuristic intersections in the network structure of university science. Along the way, the problems of inventive tasks and the promotion of scientific knowledge are solved through digital infographic visualizations on the Internet, within and between universities. The article develops an idea of socio-epistemological and interdisciplinary potentials of the phenomenon of scientific and philosophical infographics for the sustainable growth of the competitive advantages of the Russian education system. The authors analyze the world and domestic experience in infographics functioning in science, business, management and consider a new project for a domestic university education on creating a knowledge visualization center on the example of a particular university. The authors give the examples of successful international data visualization projects and pay particular attention to the creation of a holistic interdisciplinary catalog of infographics. University digital library can serve as a source of databases and potentials of the visualization center, as a tool for visualizing this data. The authors discuss the possibility of infographic expertise procedure formation as a new methodology for analyzing and improving various program documents, social development programs, business projects, and dissertations. The article makes the case for developing infographic competencies of innovation actors in education, business and public administration.
About the Authors
A. V. MakulinRussian Federation
Artem V. Makulin - Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Assoc. Prof.
Address: 51, Troitskiy ave., Arkhangelsk, 163000
M. I. Korzina
Russian Federation
Maria I. Korzina - Senior Lecturer, Department of Information Systems and Technologies
Address: 17, Severnoy Dviny emb., Arkhangelsk, 163002
References
1. Sosinskaya, S.S. (2004). [The Role of Information Flows in University Management and Their Visualization Levels]. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta = Proceedings of Irkutsk State Technical University. No. 3 (19), pp. 83-86. (In Russ.)
2. Knyazeva, E.N. (2014). Enaktivizm: novaya forma konstruktivizma v epistemologii [Enactivism: A New Form of Constructivism in Epistemology]. Moscow; St. Petersburg: Center for Humanitarian Initiatives; University Book, 352 p. (In Russ.)
3. Tufte, E. (1990). Envisioning Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press, 126 p.
4. Polonnikov, A.A., Kalachikova, O.N., Korol, D.Yu., Korchalova, N.D. (2016). Text-Centered Educational Discourse in the Mirror of Contemporary Visual Culture. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 10 (205), pp. 48-61. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. Korol, D.Yu. (2015). Education and Challenges of Contemporaneity (Remarks on the Research Project). Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 1, pp. 70-76. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Inishev, I.N. (2011). The Interplay of the Material and the Semantic within Iconic Experience. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya = Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. No. 4 (16), pp. 86-93. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Simakova, S.I., Fedotovskiy, V.V. (2016). Infographics: Past, Present, Future. Znak: problemnoe pole mediaobrazovaniya = Sign: Problematic Field of Media Education. No. 3 (20), pp. 13-25. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. Drucker, J. (2014). Graphesis: Visual Forms of Knowledge Production. Harvard University Press, 215 p.
9. Eppler, M.J., (2002). Making Knowledge Visible through Knowledge Maps / Holsapple, C. (Ed.). In: Holsapple, C.W. (Ed.). Handbook on Knowledge Management. Springer, New York, pp. 189-206.
10. Pukhov, A.F. (2009). [About the «Periodic» Table of Visualization Methods]. Komp’yuternye instrumenty v obrazovanii = Computer Tools in Education. 2009. No. 1, pp. 52-56. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
11. Wright, R. (1990). Computer Graphics as Allegorical Knowledge. Electronic Imagery in the Sciences. Leonardo. Supplemental Issue. Vol. 3, pp. 65-73. DOI:10.2307/1557896
12. Kryuchkov, E.F., Pilyugin, V.V., Tikhomirov, G.V. (2013). Technology of Scientific Visualization at a Research University. In: Scientific session of NRNU MEPhI-2013, Moscow, February 1-6, 2013. Vol. 3, p. 84. (In Russ.)
13. Shchuchinov, O.S., Ladyzhets, N.S. (2009). Comparative Analysis of Representative Strategies for Visualizing Western Universities’ Academic Resources and High-technologies in Cyberspace. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya Filosofiya. Psihologiya. Pedagogika = Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy. No. 1, pp. 3-24. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
14. Laamarti, F., Eid, M., El Saddik, A. (2014). An Overview of Serious Games. International Journal of Computer Games Technology. October, pp. 1-15. DOI: 10.1155/2014/358152
15. Byzov, L.A. (1933). Ob organizatsii instituta graficheskogo yazyka: obshchie problemy graficheskogo yazyka [About the Organization of the Graphic Language Institute: (General Problems of the Graphic Language)]. Moscow: Kabinet rationalizatsii Publ., 21 p. (In Russ.)
16. Ivanitsky, I.P. (1932). Izobrazitel’naya statistika i venskii metod [Graphical Statistics and the Vienna Method]. Moscow; Leningrad: OGIZ-IZOGIZ Publ., 43p. (In Russ.)
17. Kireeva, N.R. (2018). Logical Positivism and Otto Neurath’s Infographic. Dekorativnoe iskusstvo i predmetno-prostranstvennaya sreda = Decorative Art and Environment. Gerald of the MGHPA. Vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 95-99. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
18. Inishev, I.N. (2012). “The Iconic Turn” in the Theories of Culture and Society. Logos: filos.-lit. zhurnal = The Logos journal. Vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 184-211. (In Russ.)
19. Berry, D.M. (2011). The Computational Turn: Thinking about the Digital Humanities. Culture machine. Vol. 12, pp. 440-470.
20. Virilio, P. (1992). La machine de vision. Paris: Galilee, 158 p. (Russian Translation: Ed. Bystrov, V.Yu., Moscow: Science Publ., 2004, 140 p.)
21. Rubakin, N.A. (1912). Rossiya v tsifrah. Strana. Narod. Sosloviya. Klassy (Opyt statisticheskoi kharakteristiki soslovno-klassovogo naseleniya russkogo gosudarstva) [Russia in Numbers. Country. People. Estates. Classes (Experience of the Statistical Characteristics of the Class Population of the Russian State)]. St. Petersburg: Vestnik znanii Publ. (by V.V. Bitner). 109 p. URL: https://b-ok.cc/dl/2387155/758bef (In Russ.)
22. McCormick, B.H., DeFanti, T.A., Brown, M. (1987). Visualization in Scientific Computing. ACM Computer Graphics. Vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 249-266. URL: http://www.sci.utah.edu/vrc2005/McCormick-1987-VSC.pdf
23. Yakutin, Yu.V. (2017). The Russian Economy: A Digital Transformation Strategy (Towards a Constructive Criticism of the Government Program “Digital Economy of the Russian Federation”). Menedzhment i biznes-administrirovanie = Management and Business Administration. No. 4, pp. 27-52. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
24. Arendt, H. (1966). The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 478 p. (Russian Translation: Ed. Kovaleva, M.S., Nosov, D.M. Moscow: CenterCom Publ., 1996, 672 p.)
25. Barsuk, N.S., Boyko, A.V. (2019). Online Visualization Services as a Tool for the Formation of Universal Competencies of Students in the Course of Project Activities. Postulat = Postulate. No. 6 (44), p. 101. (In Russ.)