Academic Writing: Difficulties and Possible Solutions for Engineering Students

Academic writing is considered to be the most challenging and difficult skill in terms of English as a Second Language. This study critically explores the obstacles in academic writing faced by students at Tomsk Polytechnic University, Russia. To investigate, a comprehensive questionnaire has been floated among professional teachers to get their expert opinions (about students’ obstacles in writing) in order to identify some problems and form effective remedial strategies eventually. This paper focuses on the two significant aspects of academic writing, namely language skills (LS) (Grammar etc.) and writing skills (WS) (writing itself as a skill). Equally relevant to the issue are organization, coherence, and connectivity. The authors claim that Russian learners have poor learning background in writing skills due to the lack of balanced syllabus and teaching technologies. Aside from this, only determining problems is not sufficient to take students out of writing phobia. Furthermore, it is necessary to point out the fact that poor reading skills also lead to this kind of disappointment. Most of Russian learners do not know how to initiate their composition (essays). This paper will prove to be an academic contribution to improve the writing skills among ESL/EFL Russian learners in general and students of Tomsk Polytechnic University in particular. The presented analysis should also be of interest to researchers in other countries (universities) in which the field of academic writing is emerging.

1. Bazerman, C., Russell, D. (Eds.) (1994). Landmark Essays on Writing Across the Curriculum. Davis, CA: Hermagoras Press. 242 р.

2. L. Scott, M. (2001). Written English, WordProcessors and Meaning Making: A Semiotic Perspective on the Development of Adult Students’ Academic Writing, In: Tolchinsky (Ed.), Developmental Aspects in Learning to Write. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 163-76.

3. Davidson, G., Lea, M. (1994). ‘Modularity’, Technical Issues Paper. London: Royal Literary Fund, pp. 161-170.

4. Torrance, M., Thomas, G., Robinson, E. (1994). The Writing Strategies of Graduate Research Students in the Social Sciences. Higher Education. Vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 379-392.

5. M. Baynham, M. (2000). Academic Writing in New and Emergent Discipline Areas. In: Lea, B. Stierer (Eds.). Student Writing in Higher Education. Buckingham, UK: The Society for Research into Higher Education / Open University Press, pp. 17-31.

6. Lea, M., Street, B. (1998). Student Writing in Higher Education: An Academic Literacies Approach. Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 157-172.

7. Lillis, T. (2003). Student Writing as “Academic Literacies”: Drawing on Bakhtin to Move from Critique to Design. Language and Education. Vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 192-207.

8. Pardoe, S. (1994). Writing in Another Culture: The Value of Students’ KAL in Writing Pedagogy, In: D. Graddol and J. Swann (Eds.). Evaluating Language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 37-51.

9. Pinzon, B. (2010). Strategies, Policies and Research on Reading and Writing in Colombian Universities. Traditions of Writing Research. New York and London, pp. 122133. 432 p.

10. Baynham, M. (1996). Literacy Practices: Investigating Literacy in Social Contexts. London: Longman, 296 p.

11. Thaiss, C. (2010). The International WAC/ WID Mapping Project: Objectives, Methods, and Early Results. Traditions of Writing Research. New York and London, 251 p.

12. Bolsunovskaya, L., Fillips K., Kolbysheva, Y., Rymanova, I., Strelnikova A. (2015). Resource Efficiency in TPU: Implementation of English Language E-courses. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 215, pp. 156-160.

13. Rymanova, I., Vlasova, M. (2016). Blended Learning in English Language Teaching for Geologists (Geoscience). In: Ecology, Economics, Education and Legislation: Conference Proceedings 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference (SGEM 2016), Sofia: STEF92 Technology Ltd., pp. 765-771.

14. Bazanova, E.M., Korotkina, I.B. (2017). Consortium of Writing Centres in Russia. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 4, pp. 50-57. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

15. Bakin, E.V. (2013). Centre of Academic Writing: Experience of Foundation. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 8/9, pp. 112-116. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

16. Dugartsyrenova, V.A. (2016). Difficulties in Teaching Foreign Language Academic Writing. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 6, pp. 106-112. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

17. Korotkina, I.B. (2016). University Centres of Academic Writing in Russia: Goals and Prospects. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 1, pp. 75-86. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

18. Korotkina, I.B. (2017). Academic Writing in Russia: The Urge for Interdisciplinary Studies. Moscow: Yurait Publ., 2017. 295 p. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2018-27-10-64-74 (In Russ.)

19. Irvin, L. (2010). What is Academic Writing? Writing Spaces: Readings on Writing. Parlor Press. Vol. 1, pp. 3-17. 272 p. Available at: http://writingspaces.org/sites/default/files/writing-spaces-readingson-writing-vol-1.pdf

20. Murray, R., Moore, S. (2006). The Handbook of Academic Writing: A Fresh Approach. Open University Press, 196 p.

21. Shchukin, A.N. (2010). Sovremennye intensivnye metody i tekhnologii obucheniya inostrannym yazykam [Modern Intensive Methods and Technologies of Teaching Foreign Languages]. Moscow: Filomatis Publ., 480 p. (In Russ.)

22. Kolesnikova, I.L., Dolgina, O.A. (2001). Anglo-russkiy terminologicheskiy spravochnik po metodike prepodavaniya inostrannykh yazykov [English-Russian Glossary on Foreign Languages Teaching Methods]. St Petersburg.: BLITS Centre, Cambridge University Press, 224 p. (In Russ.)

23. Wichadee, S. (2010). Using Wikis to Develop Summary Writing Abilities of Students in an EFL Class. Journal of College Teaching & Learning. Vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 5-10.