ABOUT DIALOGUE, MONOLOGUE, AND SILENCE IN EDUCATION
Abstract
The article deals with dialogue, monologue and silence as pedagogical phenomena. The author believes that the focus of modern teachers (scientists, lecturers, school teachers) on dialogue and dialogue technics is often accompanied by a decrease of interest to monologue. However, monologue has its indisputable advantages. Dialogue andmonologue should interact in teaching of Humanities. Silence as a component of speech activity is also noteworthy as it has different pedagogical meanings. The author concludes that in higher education it is necessary to use dialogue, monologue and silence all together.
Keywords
диалог как методологическая идея,
педагогический диалог,
монолог в обучении,
достоинства монолога,
взаимосвязь и взаимодействие диалога и монолога,
монологическое высказывание впрофессиональной подготовке гуманитария,
молчание,
педагогические функции молчания,
dialogue as a methodological idea,
pedagogical dialogue,
monologue in teaching of Humanities,
advantages of monologue,
interrelation and interaction of dialogue and monologue,
monologic statement in teaching of Humanities,
silence,
pedagogical functions of silence
About the Author
ALEVTINA S. Robotova
Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Galanova, O.A. (2013). [Dialogue as the Leading Principle of Modern Education Paradigm]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. No. 13 (141), pp. 161164. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
2. Korol’, A.D., Khutorskoi, A.V. (2007). [From Monologue to Dialogue: Methodological Foundations for Designing Heuristic Type of Education]. Internet-zhurnal «Eidos» [Eidos]. 22 Feb. (In Russ.)
3. Grigoriev, V.P. (2004). [Dialogic (Un)Intelligence]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social Sciences and Modernity]. No. 1, pp. 2640. (In Russ.)
4. Lavlinskiy, S.P. (2003). Tekhnologiya literaturnogo obrazovaniya. Kommunikativno-deyatel’nostnyi podkhod [Literature Education Technology. Communicative Approach]. Moscow. (In Russ.)
5. Golovanova, N.F. (2005). Obshchaya pedagogika [General Pedagogy]. St. Petersburg: Rech’ Publ., 317 p.
6. Izotova, N.V. (2012). [Dialogue and Monologue as Speech Forms: Comparative Characteristics]. Izvestiya Yuzhnogo federal’nogo universiteta. Filologicheskie nauki [Proc. of Southern Federal University. Philological Sciences]. No. 1, pp. 6068. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Vinokur, T.G. (1990). [Monologue Speech]. Lingvisticheskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar’. [Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary. Ed. V.N. Yartceva]. Moscow: Soviet Encyclopedia Publ., 683 p. (In Russ.)
8. Robotova, A.S. (2007). [Modern lecture: humanitarian meaning]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 4, pp. 2024. (In Russ.); Robotova, A.S. (2011). [University Lecture: Its’ Past, Present, and Future]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 4, pp. 127133. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9. Lishevskiy, V.P. (1987). Uchenye – populyarizatory nauki [Scientists are Popularizers of Science]. Moscow: Znanie Publ., 141 p. (In Russ.)
10. Karimulaeva, E.M. (2011). [Possibilities of Dialogue Learning in Professional Interaction Between Teachers and Students]. Sovremennaya nauka: aktual’nye problemy teorii i praktiki. Seriya «Gumanitarnye nauki» [Modern Science: Actual Problems of Theory and Practice. Series “Humanities”]. No. 4. (In Russ.)
11. Kolokol’tseva, T.N. (2001). Spetsificheskie kommunikativnye edinitsy dialogicheskoi rechi [Specific Communicative Units of Dialogical Speech]. Volgograd: VSU Publ., 361 p. (In Russ.)
12. Kopylova, T.R. (2014). [Silence in Modern Linguistics: Approaches to the Analysis]. [Bulletin of Udmurt University. History and Philology]. Issue 2. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
13. Loginova, N.V. (2008). [Postmodern Discource of Silence]. Zhurnal’nyi klub Intelros «Credo New» [CredoNew: journal club]. No. 2. Available at: http://www.credonew.ru/content/view/663/60/ (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
14. Melikyan, S.V. (2000). Rechevoi akt molchaniya v strukture obshcheniya. Avtoref. diss. … kand. filolog.nauk [Speech Act of Silence in Communication Structure. Thesis … Cand. Sci. Philology]. Voronezh. (In Russ.)
15. Efimova, O.Yu. (2005). Molchanie i umolchanie uchitelya v sisteme professional’nykh rechevykh taktik. Avtoref. diss. …kand. ped. nauk [Silence and Paralipsis of in Professional Teacher’s Speech. Thesis. … Cand. Sci. Pedagogy]. Novokuznetsk. (In Russ.)
Review
Views:
723
Email this article 