PSYCHOLOGICAL PRECONDITIONS OF STUDENT’S PLAGIARISM
Abstract
In the article we consider the concept of student’s plagiarism and the factors contributing to its prevalence. The results of the empirical study, which has revealed a relationship between the penchant for plagiarism and the indicators of the self-attitude andmotivation for university studies, are presented. It is shown that the most of the students understand the meaning of the word «plagiarism», but at the same time consider situation of plagiarism as acceptable. The article adduces the results of the studies of students’ representations on the prevalence, acceptable and frequency in their own experience the 10 cases of plagiarism. It was revealed that students more inclined to use plagiarism differ by lower level of self-interesting, confidence and communicative motives. It is shown that therecognition of the higher frequency plagiarism in their own learning is also related with lower levels of academic achievement and positive integral self-attitude. More important in psychological terms was identified index of acceptability of plagiarism on representations of students. It is also associated with the lower level of motivation (prestige, creative self-realization, educational and social), self-respect and positive attitude expected from the others.
About the Authors
Olga P. Merkulova
Volgograd State Socio-Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Angelina S. Danilenko
Volgograd State Socio-Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Khasanova G.F. (2013) [On the ethical representations of students of polymers study specialty]. Vestnik Kazanskogo technologicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Kazan Technological University]. No 6, pp. 331–333. (In Russ.)
2. Ozhegov S.I., Shvedova N.Y. (1994) Tolkovyy slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Explanatory Dictionary of Russian Language]. Moscow. (In Russ.)
3. Demidova O.R. (2012) [‘Making It One’s Own’, or Cultural Physiology of Plagiarism]. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A.S. Puschkina [Bulletin of Pushkin Leningrad State University journal]. Vol. 2, no 3, pp. 90-98. (In Russ.)
4. Brumshtein Yu.M., Kotlyarov I.D. (2012) [Student’s plagiarism: influence on regions intellectual and information security]. Informatsionnaya bezopasnost’ regionov [Information Security of the Regions]. No 1, pp. 30-36. (In Russ.)
5. Golunov S.V. (2010) [Plagiarism of students as a challenge to higher education system in Russia and abroad] Voprosy obrazovaniya [Journal of Educational Studies]. No 3, pp. 243-257. (In Russ.)
6. Savochkina T.S., Neratova I.V. (2009) [Student’s plagiarism in higher professional education]. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Tver State University]. No 6, pp. 90–104 (In Russ.)
7. Chernyavskaya V.E. (2011) [The plagiarism as a social-cultural phenomenon]. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta ekonomiki i finansov [News of Saint-Petersburg State University of Economics and Finance]. No 3, pp. 26-31. (In Russ.)
8. Shteyner E. Ne zhenshchina s zaytsem, a muzhchina s kozoy, ili kak ya pytayus’ uchit’ studentov [Not a woman with a hare, but the man with a goat or how I try to teach students]. Available at: http://russ.ru/Mirovayapovestka/Ne-zhenschina-s-zajcem-a-muzhchina-s-kozoj (accessed 25.01.14). (In Russ.)
9. Badmaeva N.C. (2004) Vliyanie motivatsionnogo faktora na razvitie umstvennykh sposobnostey: Monografiya [Influence of motivational factors for the development of mental abilities: monograph]. Ulan-Ude. (In Russ.)
10. Stolin V.V., Pantileev S.R. (1988) Oprosnik samootnosheniya [Test of self-attitude]. Praktikum po psikhodiagnostike: Psikho-diagnosticheskie materialy [Practicum on psychodiagnosis: Materials for psychodiagnosis]. Moscow. (In Russ.)
Review
Views:
366
Email this article 