TEXT CENTERED EDUCATIONAL DISCOURSE IN THE MIRROR OF CONTEMPORARY VISUAL CULTURE
Abstract
The ideological base of the presented research in favor of the provisions of semiotic mediation of human relations with the world and the key role of education as a breeding institution and transmission of semiotic mediators. The main problem discussed here is to try to determine whether there is concordance between the increasing cultural imaging process due to advances in technology, based mainly on the shape code, and in the formation of dominant forms of interaction. In an experimental situation a semiotic conflict between textual and visual mediators created in educational context leads us to the particular tendency. The tendency shows that 'words eat image' and is reflected in cognitive and behavioral phenomena. Working out a pedagogical concept which would establish parity between mediators and contribute to widening discourse repertoire in education is considered to be the main aim of the research presented in the article.
Keywords
визуализация культуры,
текстуальное доминирование,
коммуникативное ассоциирование,
микрокоммуникативное исследование,
медиация образовательной коммуникации,
visualization of culture,
textual dominance,
communicative association,
micro communicative study,
mediation of educational communication
About the Authors
Alexander A. Polonnikov
Belarusian State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga N. Kalachikova
Tomsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dmitry Yu. Korol
Belarusian State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia D. Korchalova
Belarusian State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Nancy, J.JL. (2007). Skladka mysli Deleza [The Deleuzian Fold of Thought]. Trans. from French. Vita cogitans. No. 5, pp. 149J156. (In Russ.)
2. RancewJSikora, D. (2007). Analiza konwersacyjna jako metoda badania rozmów codziennych [Conversation Analysis as a Test Method Calls Daily]. Warszawa: TRIO, 152 p. (In Polish)
3. Filippov, A. (2011). Razvivaya teoriyu sobytii. Stat’ya pervaya. Didakticheskii eksperiment [Developing the Theory of Events. Article One. Didactic Experiment]. Sociologicheskoe obozrenie [Sociological Review]. Vol. 10. No. 1J2, pp. 6J18. (In Russ.)
4. Bassey, M. (1999). Case Study Research in Educational Settings. Buckingham: Open University Press, 192 р.
5. GrzymałaJKazłowska, A. (2004). Socjologicznie zorientowana analiza dyskursu na tle współ czesnych badań nad dyskursem [Sociologically Oriented Discourse Analysis on the Background of Contemporary Research on Discourse]. Kultura i Społeczeństwo [Culture and Society]. No. 48 (1), pp. 13J34. (In Polish)
6. BekusJGoncharova, N.E. & Korol’, D.Yu. (2004). Kommunikatsiya i kul’turogenez sovrmennosti: metafory sub’ektivnosti [Communication and Cultural Genesis of Modernity: the Subjectivity of Metaphor]. In: Gusakovsky, M.A. (Ed.) Universitet kak centr kul’turoporozhdayushchego obrazovaniya. Izmenenie form kommunikatsii v uchebnom processe [University as a Center of Culture Generating Education. Changing Forms of Communication in the Learning Process]. Minsk: Belarusian State University Publ., pp. 94J97. (In Russ.)
7. McLuhan, M. (2003). Galaktika Gutenberga: Sotvorenie cheloveka pechatnoj kul’tury [The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Creation of Man Print Culture]. Transl. from English. Kiev: NikaJCentr Publ., 432 p. (In Russ.)
8. Szkudliarek, T. (2009) Media. Szkic z filozofii i pedagogiki dystansu [A Sketch of the Philosophy and Pedagogy of Distance]. Kraków : Impuls Publ., 151 p. (In Polish)
9. Konecki, K.T. (2012). Wizualna teoria ugruntowana. Podstawowe zasady i procedury [Visual Grounded Theory. Basic Principles and Procedures]. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej [Qualitative Sociology Review]. Vol. VIII. No. 4, pp. 12J45. (In Polish)
10. Mitchell, W. J. T. (2005). What Do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 408 p.
11. Geller, L. (2013). Ehkfrasis, ili Obnazhenie priema. Neskol’ko voprosov i tezis [Ekphrasis, or Outcrop Reception. A Few Questions and Thesis]. In: Tokarev, D.V. (Ed.) «Nevyrazimoe vyrazimoe»: ehkfrasis i problemy reprezentacii vizual’nogo v hudozhestvennom tekste [«Indescribably Expressible: Ecphrasis and Visual Representation of the Problem in the Art Text]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., pp. 44J60. (In Russ.)
12. Drabek, M. (2010). Dominacja wzroku. Kryzys pisma po zwrocie wizualnym [Domination Sight. Crisis Magazine after the Return of the Visual]. Kultura – Historia – Globalizacja [Culture – History – Globalization]. No. 8, pp. 37J46. (In Polish)
13. Kozielska, M. (2004). Edukacja akademicka w społeczeństwe informacyjnym [University Education in the Information Society]. Edukacja Jutra. Tatrzanskie seminarium naukowe [Education of Tomorrow. Tatra seminar]. Wrocław, pp. 95J100. (In Polish)
14. McLuhan, H.M. (2003). Ponimanie Media: vneshnie rasshireniya cheloveka [Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man]. Transl. from English. Moscow: KANONJpressJC; Kuchkovo Pole Publ., 464 p. (In Russ.)
15. Arnheim, R. (1974). Iskusstvo i vizual’noe vospriyatie [Art and Visual Perception]. Transl. from English. Moscow: Progress Publ., 392 p. (In Russ.)
16. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon. Vol. 9. 5. Available at: www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky.pdf
17. Ankersmit, F.R. (2003). Narrativnaya logika. Semanticheskij analiz yazyka istorikov [The Narrative Logic. Semantic Analysis of the Historian Language]. Translated from Eng. Moscow: Ideya Press, 360 p. (In Russ.)
18. Sztompka, P. (2010). Vizual’naya sociologiya. Fotografiya kak metod issledovaniya [Visual Sociology. Photography as a Research Method]. Transl. from Polish. Moscow: Logos Publ., 150 p. (In Russ.)
19. Tokarev, D.V. (2013). Deskriptivnyj i narrativnyj aspekty ehkfrasisa («Mertvyi Khristos» Gol’beinaJ Dostoevskogo i «Sikstinskaya madonna» RafaelyaJZhukovskogo) [Descriptive and Narrative Aspects Ecphrasis («Dead Christ,» HolbeinJDostoevsky and the «Sistine Madonna» by RaphaelJ Zhukovsky)]. In: Tokarev, D.V. (Ed.) «Nevyrazimoe vyrazimoe»: ehkfrasis i problemy reprezentacii vizual’nogo v hudozhestvennom tekste [«Indescribably Expressible: Ecphrasis and Visual Representation of the Problem in the Art Text]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., pp. 61J109. (In Russ.)
20. Austin, I.L. (1999). Izbrannoe [The Selected]. Transl. from English. Moscow: IdeyaJPress; Dom intellektual’noj knigi Publ., 332 p. (In Russ.)
21. Bart, R. (1997). Camera lucida. Transl. from French. Moscow: Ad Marginem Publ., 224 p. (In Russ.)
22. Makarov, M.L. (2003). Osnovy teorii diskursa [The Fundamentals of Theory of Discourse]. Moscow: Gnozis Publ., 280 p. (In Russ.)
23. Arnheim, R. (1994). Novye ocherki po psihologii iskusstva [New Essays on the Psychology of Art]. Transl. from English. Moscow: Prometei Publ., 352 p. (In Russ.)
24. Foucault, M.(1999). Eto ne trubka [This is Not a Pipe]. Transl. from French. Moscow: HudoJ zhestvennyj zhurnal Publ., 152 p. (In Russ.)
25. Szkudlarek, T. (2009). Wiedza i wolność w pedagogice amerykańskiego postmodernismu [KnowJ ledge and Freedom in the Pedagogy of American Postmodernism]. Krakow: Impuls Publ., 246 p. (In Polish)
Review
Views:
306
Email this article 